Thursday, November 12, 2020

Post-election analysis and plans from the Green Howie Hawkins - Angela Walker campaign

Below is a substantial statement sent out by the Green Party's presidential campaign Monday, November 9th, looking at the results of the election and proposing directions for Green and general left organizing over the next four years.  Apparently the NC party has again lost its ballot access, meaning time, effort, and resources will again have to be spent to get Green candidates on to the ballot in future elections (where the media can then try to ignore them), rather than focusing on getting Green candidates elected.  If the Democrats regain control of the legislature they might try to make the rules for getting on the ballot more onerous (I think it was under the Republicans that the requirements were reduced).  The statement mentions the need for a dues-paying mass party, and the North Carolina Green Party uses this model, though members still seem "isolated" (where is the Triangle branch?) and the party could do more between and beyond elections.  This statement is similar to the shorter press release posted on their campaign website November 7th:  howiehawkins.us/release-hawkins-and-walker-react-to-trumps-defeat/ 

 

"We want to express our deepest thanks to all who supported our campaign through a particularly difficult year for Greens and independent socialists. Your encouragement gave us the strength and resolve to give the campaign our all.

 

We’re not stopping. We are continuing to the fight for our program, to organize our grassroots political base, and to build cooperation across the independent green and socialist left. We have filed for the next election cycle as Howie Hawkins For Our Future so we can continue to raise and spend money on this political organizing.

 

We invite you to keep working with us.

 

We are happy to say good riddance to Trump. But we also know that Biden has no solutions. As he said to billionaire donors at a high rollers fundraiser, “Nothing would fundamentally change.”

 

We know that a lot has to fundamentally change to resolve the life-or-death problems of climate, poverty, racism, and nuclear war. We are running out of time. Real solutions can’t wait!

 

So we are continuing to speak out and organize to advance our policy demands, to strengthen local parties, to secure state ballot lines, and to help elect thousands to local offices and, on that foundation, to state legislatures and the House of Representatives. 

 

We have just begun to organize and we want you with us in this fight.

 

What Happened?

 

This election was simply a referendum on Trump. Biden was Not-Trump, nothing more.

 

The Green campaign was blanked out in the national corporate media and most of the progressive media. The Green ticket came in fourth again nationally, although our vote was substantially down from 2016. The Green Party was on 30 state ballots, down from 45 in 2015, due to the difficulties of petitioning during Covid-19 pandemic, a competitive primary that delayed petitioning before the nominating convention, and aggressive ballot petition challenges by the Democratic Party. If votes per dollar were the measure, we won in a landslide at around $1.25 per vote compared to over $13 per vote for Biden.

 

We must face the fact that we largely fell short in our two primary campaign goals.

 

One goal was to advance our policy demands, including a full-strength Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and ending the endless wars.

 

Polling shows these policy demands have majority support. Trump and Biden opposed them. Yet the media excluded us.

 

However, we were able to reach millions through social media, especially young people who are fighting for their futures and want climate, racial, and economic justice – now!

 

Our second goal was to expand ballot access for the Green Party. Our vote was too low in every state where it might have gained or extended our ballot status. We lost our hard-won ballot status in states like New Mexico, New York, and North Carolina. The Green Party still retains ballot status in many states by other criteria and we plan to help state parties secure ballot access in every state in the next few years.

 

We should also recognize that the progressive Democrats got clobbered, too – or more accurately, clobbered themselves. Once the corporate Democrats closed ranks with Biden to defeat Bernie Sanders, the progressive Democrats lined up behind Biden without making any policy demands. Their prominent personalities focused on a public smear campaign against the Greens as “spoilers” instead of advancing a progressive agenda. They now have little if any political leverage with the Biden administration. The corporate Democrats are already blaming progressive Democrats for supposedly making the presidential election too close and for the loss of some US Senate races.

 

The good news is to be found in many local Green campaigns. Emmanuel Estrada was elected mayor of Baldwin Park in east Los Angeles. Franca Mueller Paz finished second with 35% for Baltimore city council, which has been an all-Democratic one-party dictatorship for nearly 80 years. Lisa Savage’s 4% for a Maine US Senate seat in a close race was highlighted her widely appreciated presentation of a positive program in televised debates in contrast to the sour negative sniping by the major party candidates. We had over 200 Green candidates this year and at least 10 won their elections. 

 

What’s Next?

 

These local campaigns tell us what we need to do next. We need to go back to the Green Party’s roots in organizing local party chapters, leading issue campaigns in our communities, and electing people to local office. We need to rebuild the Green Party from the bottom up.

 

We want to help local parties get better organized and capable of leading issue campaigns and electing thousands as we go into the 2020s to local office, and, on that foundation, to state legislatures and the House.

 

We want to help state parties recover or gain ballot lines, starting next year, so our local candidates can more easily get on the ballot and our 2024 presidential campaign will be on the ballot in all 50 states.

 

We want to keep pushing our program in the social movements – the ecosocialist Green New Deal, the Economic Bill of Rights to end poverty and economic insecurity, community control of the police, peace initiatives, and voting rights and pro-democracy reforms, including ranked-choice voting and proportional representation.

 

We have low expectations that any significant progressive reforms can be won under a Biden administration. Biden promises a national unity administration, with Republicans in the cabinet and an emphasis on working across the aisle with Republicans in Congress. 

 

A Covid relief package brokered with Republicans in Congress is likely to be crumbs for working people and tax breaks and subsides for the super-rich and the giant corporations. Their bipartisan trickle-down theory assumes the rich will invest this corporate welfare in the real economy to create jobs when the reality is they will invest most of it in financial assets – stocks, bonds, commodities, real estate – which won’t trickle down to the rest of us as living-wage jobs.

 

The next few years will be a time for us to build popular support for our state and national policy demands and to build a grassroots party power base that can conduct effective state and national issue and electoral campaigns.

 

We think it is time for the Green Party to re-organize itself as a dues-paying mass-membership party rooted in strong local party chapters. We must face the fact that the Green Party’s 20-year experiment as a national party organized as a federation of state ballot lines has failed. The current Green base largely consists of isolated party registrants and supporters who are not organized into local party chapters or into Green issue and electoral campaigns. The party has not had the funding to provide support staff for effective party field organizing, public communications, and issue and electoral campaigns.

 

We will also continue to encourage solidarity and cooperation among Green and independent socialist groups in building a major party of the left in US politics. None of us is big enough to be the major party. All of us should work together to build that party.

 

We hope will you to stay supportive and engaged in our organizing and activities. 

 

We are determined, not defeated. 

 

In solidarity,

 

Howie Hawkins and Angela Walker"

Friday, November 06, 2020

NC Rally to Protect Our Votes with Team Democracy November 7th in Raleigh - #CountEveryVote

There will be a rally at Halifax Mall in downtown Raleigh (16 West Jones Street) Saturday, November 7th (which also happens to be the 103rd anniversary of the anti-capitalist Great October Socialist Revolution in the former Russian Empire in 1917) 1 - 3pm "to demonstrate mass, peaceful support for counting all the votes and respecting the results.  Join us in celebrating our democracy and protecting our votes."  Participants are asked to wear masks and maintain social distance.  This is being organized by Team Democracy, Carolina Federation, National Domestic Workers' Alliance, NC Association of Educators, NC AFL-CIO, UNITE-HERE Local 23, Fight for $15, Black Workers for Justice, Durham for All, Down Home NC, Carolina Jews for Justice, Sunrise Movement, Siembra NC, Piedmont Rising, United Electrical 150 - the NC Public Service Workers Union, Southern Workers Assembly, Triangle Showing Up for Racial Justice, Guilford for All, and others.  For more information see: 

 

www.mobilize.us/carolinafederation/

 

facebook.com/events/354726659170975

 

I think there were similar protests in Durham and Hillsborough earlier in the week and people are observing the vote counting.

 

The votes for each office should be accurately counted and the winners installed in office, and there should be action in the streets if that doesn't happen, not only in courts, to avoid a repeat of the 2000 election.  Once the election is safely over, holding the president's "feet to the fire" can begin (preferably from the start of his term, as happened in 2017), though I think many of the people fired up over the Trump administration will stay silent while the media and some prominent leftists will take a more friendly and cooperative stance towards the executive branch if Biden-Harris wins, and there are few national level organizations not coopted by the Democrats to organize resistance.  Whether the president is Biden or Trump there is likely to be continuing police brutality, repression, loss of civil liberties, corporate welfare, anti-unionism, austerity, climate crises, corruption, coups, and the current wars will continue and more might be started, but under Biden there would be fewer protests and the media would hide what is going on or they would cover it, but with less shared outrage and sympathy, to return things to Clinton-Bush-Obama "normal."  NPR even briefly referred to the US anti-war movement during the last four years, but I don't remember them ever saying those words under George W Bush or Obama.  I have yet to hear them refer to Green and Socialist candidate Howie Hawkins or any other 2020 third party candidate for president, though I did hear about two references to the existence of the Green Party, mentioning Democratic Party attempts to remove the Green Party from ballots and when saying that there were not any third party choices this year.  Four years ago they mentioned Green candidate Jill Stein by name only after the election was over.  If eight years of Obama-Biden imperialist neoliberalism and inadequate response to climate change resulted in the last four years, how will things stand after four to eight more years of neoliberal Democratic rule with inadequate resistance from the left, economic and health crises, ever more obvious climate change, and the rise of China and other competitors in an increasingly multipolar world?  In four years there will again be the demand that Americans vote for the supposedly "lesser evil," covering over what the Democrats have done, there probably won't be a strong third party challenger, and there is the possibility of someone like Trump, but more effective at governing, and possibly less "isolationist," coming up.  It seems naïve to willfully misleading to assert that Biden will change his spots much as president, and the Republicans will probably control the Senate, as well as the Supreme Court.  If I'm not mistaken the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress at the start of Obama's first term, and so had a free hand to carry out the sweeping progressive policies they supposedly want to implement now.  On the other hand maybe things are coming to such a point that public anger won't go back underground for long if Biden wins.             

 

Saturday, October 31, 2020

Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity volume 2, issue 3 out, etc.

A new issue of Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity, a Journal of Discussion and Debate, came out today, though it has not yet been posted online, at:  redstarpublishers.org/TMLU.htm

 

Contents:

On the US Presidential Elections.

Elections Won’t Defeat Fascism, Only We Can

Communist (PCUSA) for Congress in Vermont!

Poem: The Carpet Weavers of Kuyan-Bulak Honor Lenin 

Natural History Museum’s Racist Statue Still Stands

Fully Reopen the Libraries, and more

Cuomo and New York State Legislature Make Ballot Access More Difficult for Third Parties

Humor and Stupidity Article

Is There a Need for a Marxist-Leninist International?

 

Artículo en español  

 

¿Hace falta la Internacional Marxista-Leninista?

 

Also, here are a few corrections to previous posts, notes on Tuesday's elections, etc.: 

 

Bush and Obama tried to overthrow the government of Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, first elected when Bill Clinton was the US president, and almost succeeded in the spring of 2002. Nicolas Maduro was first elected in April 2013 and has been targeted by both Democrats and Republicans ever since.  

 

Trump almost started a disastrous war with Iran at the start of 2020, but it could also be mentioned that, if not for Russian diplomacy, Obama seemed to be about to start a direct war against Syria in 2013, and the US has been waging a proxy war against Syria.  Since I wrote that post it could be noted that while Obama and Hillary Clinton supported the 2009 coup in Honduras and successful removed president Zelaya, a year ago Trump supported the coup in Bolivia against Venezuela ally Evo Morales of the Movement Toward Socialism (MAS) and, though Morales is still in exile, a recent election again gave the presidency and legislative majority to MAS.   

 

Also, did NCCU's WNCU 90.7 FM censor Democracy Now! shortly after 7:30pm Monday, October 19th because Jeremy Scahill (?) was rightly condemning Obama for killing American citizens, some minors not accused of any crime, overseas, as well as condemning Trump's violence?  The broadcast was interrupted and did not continue, without explanation.

 

Supposedly China, Iran, and Cuba want Biden elected, which would be some of his best endorsements if true (yet Biden attacks Trump from the right on China and the media is media is beginning to talk about the possibility of a war with geographically huge, populous, technologically sophisticated, and nuclear-armed China in the near future, such as on the BBC yesterday).  After a prolonged period of silence, a new issue of the Revolutionary Organization Labor, USA's newsletter is calling for voting for Biden, as are some other Marxist groups (ROL supported Jill Stein of the Green Party in 2016).  That could be the correct course, but on the other hand the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (publisher of Fight Back!) supported the Obama campaign (I think beyond just voting), and then the Obama-Biden administration spied on and harassed them for anti-imperialist organizing.  Every four years the line from some is that we have to vote for some awful Democrat, because the "ultra-right," greatest mass murderers in history (whatever Noam Chomsky has been saying) Republican Party is worse, and we can vote for a better candidate in some future election that will never come (in the meantime holding the awful Democrat's 'feet to the fire,' but more effort and money is put into electing Democrats than to criticism and holding them accountable, organizing a better option, or demonstrating when they engage in "humanitarian interventionist" wars, "pivot to Asia," shield CIA torture and NSA domestic surveillance, push "free trade" agreements and austerity, engaged in mass deportations, broke up Occupy Wall Street, wouldn't consider Medicare for All or a real Green New Deal, etc. ).       

 

Before the primary election, I think the Independent Weekly said Democratic US Senate candidate Cal Cunningham had been involved in the 751 South project, which would explain why his name seemed familiar and would be a large negative mark if true.  

Friday, October 16, 2020

Revolusjon: Norwegian troops out of the Middle East!

Below is an article from the Revolusjon newspaper of the Norwegian party Communist Platform – Marxist-Leninist (KPml).  Despite Scandinavian "socialism" (capitalist economic relations with social-democratic politics), Northern European or Nordic countries like Norway still cooperate with US imperialism, belong to NATO, and carry out imperialist military adventures abroad.

 

I supported US social-democrat Bernie Sanders in the primary, but in the heady days at the beginning of the year when it looked like someone on the left of the Democratic Party could actually become the nominee and then president, I began to have doubts.  For example, Sanders has condemned Bolivarian Venezuela, and what if his populist social-democratic administration, with cover on the left, were to succeed in overthrowing President Maduro through covert operations or war, where Bush, Obama, and so far Trump have failed?  There is little doubt that Trump, Biden, and Harris stand for economic warfare and violent interference in Venezuela and other countries, for imperialist US economic and strategic interests.

 

Special forces and Norwegian bases in Jordan and Iraq are a provocation and a threat towards the peoples of the Middle East.

 

Norwegian special forces have been operating in Jordan since 2016 to provide operational support to jihadist terrorist groups, also called "rebel groups", as part of pushing for a bloody regime change in neighboring Syria. It is a public secret that Norwegian special forces have operated illegally inside Syrian territory; the false pretext being 'combatting ISIL' (but certainly not the Nusra Front).

 

This activity will now become permanent at the training and intelligence base Camp Åsgård outside the Jordanian capital Amman.

 

The purpose of this training, which partly takes place along with Jordanian forces, is "to make the Norwegian combat force more able to carry out war operations in desert landscapes", besides providing logistical support for the Norwegian military presence in Iraq. In addition, the Norwegian intelligence service will obtain a better "overview of the Middle East".

 

This escalation is an outright provocation against the Arab peoples, who do not want a "Norwegian presence" in their region at all. Norwegian special forces and intelligence activities pose a direct threat to the Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese and freedom-loving peoples throughout the Levant.

 

We are witnessing unadorned Norwegian imperialism

 

What we are witnessing is unadorned Norwegian imperialism preparing to take part in new American "desert wars" and as mercenaries for future palace coups and regime changes that are contrary to international law.

 

The partnership with the oppressive Jordanian regime is due to the fact that the Kingdom has been a stable supporter of US imperialism in the Middle East for generations. It was not without reason that Egyptian President Nasser branded former Jordanian King Hussein "a lackey for the United States."

 

Norwegian base policy* is distorted into the unrecognizable. From having been a stabilizing element in the High North, Norway is allowing permanent US bases in our country. In addition, Norway establishes military bases and facilities in remote areas to guard Norwegian imperialist interests.

 

With its imperialist conduct and lackey services for the United States, Norway has already disqualified itself for a seat on the UN Security Council in the period 2021–2022.

 

Norwegian military forces out of Jordan and Iraq! Get Norwegian imperialism out of the Middle East!

 

* When entering the NATO Alliance in 1949, Norway made a reservation forbidding the presence of foreign bases on Norwegian soil, unless the country is under attack.

 

https://revolusjon.no/hjem/english/statements/2269-norwegian-troops-out-of-the-middle-east/

 

Communist Platform – Marxist-Leninist (KPml)

 

October 14th 2020.

Saturday, October 10, 2020

The 75th anniversary of the founding of the Workers' Party of Korea

October 10th is the 75th anniversary of the 1945 founding of what is today the Workers' Party of Korea, celebrated as Party Foundation Day in DPR Korea.  The original Communist Party of Korea was clandestinely founded in Seoul in 1925, but fell apart as a national organization due to factionalism, lost the confidence of the Comintern, and was repressed by the Japanese occupiers during the 30's.  Below is an October 9th article from the official DPRK website Naenara ( www.naenara.com.kp/ , unavailable for years if not today in the ROK), available in English and several other languages.  Naenara includes information about DPRK politics, economics, history, culture, foods, the environment and natural wonders, tourist information (except for the pandemic, there are group tours through companies such as koryogroup.com/ ), photos, online books, and freely downloadable songs.  The Korean Central News Agency, founded December 5, 1946, also has articles in English:  www.kcna.kp/kcna.user.home.retrieveHomeInfoList.kcmsf   

DPRK holidays later in the year include Mother's Day (November 16th); the December 24th anniversary of the birth of Kim Jong-suk, a guerilla during the war for independence from Japan, Kim Il Sung's first wife, and Kim Jong Il's mother; and Constitution Day, marking the adoption of the Socialist Constitution of the DPRK at the 5th Supreme People's Assembly December 27, 1972, replacing the 1948 constitution (Juche replaced Marxism-Leninism in a 1992 amendment). 

Today is also the 119th anniversary of the beginning of the Wuchang Uprising in 1911, part of the Xinhai or Chinese Revolution, which overthrew the last Qing emperor and established the Republic of China with Sun Yat-sen as president.  It is still the national day in Taiwan but is also important in the People's Republic of China (China's National Day marks October 1, 1949)

According to Wikipedia, October 10th is Vietnam's Capital Liberation Day and Cuba's Independence Day, commemorating the Grito de Yara at the beginning of the Ten Years' War in 1868.  It took two more wars before Spanish rule was successfully overthrown in 1898, followed by a few years of direct military occupation and decades of subservience to the USA until 1959. 

Historic Cause of Party Founding Comes True

President Kim Il Sung buckled down to founding the Party after Korea’s liberation (August 15, 1945) on the basis of organizational and ideological preparations he had made during the period of the anti-Japanese revolutionary struggle.

In his speech delivered to military and political cadres of the Korean People’s Revolutionary Army on August 20, Juche 34 (1945), he set forth the three-point task of founding a party, state and armed forces in the liberated homeland and set the party founding as the primary task.

In his talk to the military and political cadres and the senior officials of the Wonsan City Communist Party Organizations on September 19, he underscored the need to found the party in such a way of forming party organizations in local areas first and, on this basis, forming the central leadership organ of the party.

He dispatched the anti-Japanese revolutionary fighters to different parts of the country in order to build up local party organizations.

They positively readjusted and fortified the existing Party organizations and formed new Party organizations where there had been no organization.

As a result, Party organizations at all levels were formed across the country, to say nothing of all industrial establishments.

Kim Il Sung Kim Il Sung met with local communists active in different parts of Korea to explain the policy of founding a unified party and led them to the efforts to this end.

He mapped out the organizational and political lines of the party to be founded in the future and took measures for training party officials, while directing the work of anti-Japanese revolutionary fighters active in all provinces.

A preliminary meeting for founding the party was convened on October 5, in which it discussed the issue of establishing the Central Organizing Committee of the Communist Party of North Korea as the party central leadership body.

Kim Il Sung Kim Il Sung convened the Inaugural Congress of the Central Organizing Committee of the Communist Party of North Korea in Pyongyang from October 10 to 13, Juche 34 (1945).

On October 10, the first day of the congress, the Central Organizing Committee of the Communist Party of North Korea was formed and the founding of the Party was solemnly declared.

As a result, the historic cause of founding a Juche-type revolutionary party, which started from the formation of the Down-with-Imperialism Union, came true successfully.

Wednesday, October 07, 2020

World Can't Wait on the 19th anniversary of the Afghanistan War and Black Alliance for Peace on AFRICOM

Below is a statement by Debra Sweet, representing the anti-war group World Can't Wait ( worldcantwait.net ), on the Afghanistan War, launched October 7, 2001.  The second statement is from the Black Alliance Peace ( blackallianceforpeace.com) campaign against the US military's Africa Command; BAP recently organized an International Day of Action of AFRICOM, on the anniversary of AFRICOM's creation October 1, 2008.  Since then the US military has carried out cooperative operations in several African countries; carries out airstrikes in Somalia, at an increasing tempo under Trump; shattered Libya, which had been one of the most prosperous countries in Africa (Obama's 2011 Libya War was probably the biggest US attack on an African country), and there has been talk of splitting the wartorn country into 2 or 3 parts, not due to actual national differences, but instead over who will control Libya's oil; and adjacent to Africa, the US is part of the Saudi-led war against Yemen, aids Israeli aggression and colonialism, and the strategic Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia was held and depopulated by the UK for US military use, which continues today. 

The Democrats speak of 'restoring America's leadership in the world,' which sounds like a call to carry out more wars and coups. Would a Biden-Harris administration, no doubt better at governing than Trump, and better at lulling the public, intervene (again, in some cases) in Libya, Syria, Iran, Yemen, Belarus, Nagorno-Karabakh, Ukraine, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Korea, on the maritime borders of China, or somewhere yet unknown, to demonstrate what happens to those who oppose US dictates?  Trump is a reactionary and speaks like a warmonger, but so far he hasn't started any new wars (though he came close with Iran in January), unlike Obama and Biden in their first term.  The US supported the 2009 coup in Honduras and the proxy war in Syria began during Obama's first term, followed by the 2014 coup in Ukraine, while under Trump there was the November 2019 coup in Bolivia.  Democratic Congressional leaders condemn Trump's foreign policy from the right, opposing attempts to improve relations with Russia and DPR Korea and they support overthrowing the government of Venezuela (in addition, media aligned with the Democratic Party undermined attempts to negotiate an end to the war in Afghanistan). They have long advocated moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and lavish Israel with military and civilian aid, even as it brutalizes the Palestinians and nearby countries, and undermines US foreign policy. The US planned to spend huge amounts of money on nuclear and conventional weapons under both Obama and Trump and the Obama administration wanted to “pivot to Asia” from the Middle East to oppose China. Trump and Biden both set up China as a major strategic enemy, justifying huge military spending, while other needs go unmet and austerity may be on the agenda. The “War on Terror” still isn't over after 19 years, and it isn't clear which of the two major parties will be the greater warmongering interventionist and enemy of peace over the next four years (despite the WCW and others considering Trump the greater enemy).

Also, the 25th National Day of Protest to Stop Police Brutality, Repression, and the Criminalization of a Generation will be October 22nd: www.october22.org/

           

WCW:  U.S. War on Afghanistan: an outrage for 19 years

19 years. The longest foreign war in the bloody history of the U.S. empire.  Afghanistan: geographically in the way of imperial conquerors for centuries, historically preyed upon by various military forces and further torn apart by the U.S. and its NATO allies in the global "war on terror."

The U.S. aggression on Afghanistan, one of the poorest countries on the globe, has to be condemned for its devilish destruction of life.  The
Watson Institute at Brown University [ watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/afghan ] says, "As of October 2019, more than 43,000 civilians are estimated to have died violent deaths as a result of the war."  But, as we know from first-hand accounts by journalists, the deaths were mostly uncounted.  It's from Afghanistan that hundreds of Muslim pilgrims and farmers were kidnapped for bounty, ending up in Guantanamo for years, many having nothing to do with al Queda or the Taliban.  Despite the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld claim that the war would be launched to save Afghan women, it remains one of the most dangerous places for a woman.  43% of people have "basic" sanitation and the maternal death rate remains high.  All sides use rape as a weapon of war.  All three U.S. administrations are responsible: Bush, Obama, Trump.

The Washington Post's Afghanistan Project revealed the sheer incompetence, brutality and lying of the U.S. occupation. "Over the course of 18 years, three administrations have deployed nearly 800,000 troops (2,400 of whom were killed), dropped 40,000 bombs, filled the skies with high tech drones to spread terror and direct air strikes, and spent at least a trillion dollars. Again and again their best political and military strategists have come up with new plans and spent years trying to implement each one." But, as the Afghanistan Project sums up, “military commanders have been unable to deliver on their promises to prevail.”  Read more in “The Afghanistan Papers”: The Lies Exposed — and the Deeper Truths That Need to Come Out [ revcom.us/a/631/afghanistan-papers-lies-exposed-and-deeper-truths-that-need-to-come-out-en.html ].

This situation continues to this day, as Pompeo negotiates with the Taliban, after getting essentially nowhere.  Then there's his boss:  “If we wanted to fight a war in Afghanistan and win it, I could win that war in a week. I just don't want to kill 10 million people” (stated by Trump in 2019).  

 

BAP:  Is AFRICOM Moving to South Carolina?

Individuals and organizations from around the world joined the Black Alliance for Peace (BAP) on International Day of Action on AFRICOM [ blackallianceforpeace.com/dayofactiononafricom ], calling for the U.S. government to shut down its African command (AFRICOM) and withdraw its bases and military personnel from Africa.

When AFRICOM was launched October 1, 2008, U.S. authorities—understanding the political ramifications—realized it would be impossible to house the command headquarters in Africa. Hence, the German city of Stuttgart was chosen as the base of operations.

The Obama administration and NATO attacked and destroyed Libya, whose leader, Muammar Gaddafi, chaired the African Union, the continent-wide structure committed to African unity and cooperation. But with Libya in disarray and no African leader to voice opposition, the U.S. Department of Defense has floated the idea of moving AFRICOM’s headquarters to Africa. Then this past week, it suggested placing it in the U.S. state of South Carolina because the Trump administration has plans to move thousands of U.S. troops out of Germany.

The arrogance involved in considering basing AFRICOM in South Carolina is exactly why an International Day of Action on AFRICOM and our ongoing campaign, U.S. Out of Africa: Shut Down AFRICOM [ blackallianceforpeace.com/usoutofafrica ], is so important. The hubris and psychopathology of white supremacy could easily lead it to make the error of attempting to bring AFRICOM to the Black-Belt South, where it would be met with ferocious opposition—all despite U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-South Carolina).

BAP is clear. We are not moved by paternalistic pandering from politicians, who pretend Black lives matter in the United States while they support racist U.S. subversion, sanctions, and warmongering against Africans and other non-European peoples and nations. 

We intend to shut down AFRICOM, close all U.S. foreign military bases, and dismantle the U.S. war machine for ourselves and for the world.

 

Saturday, September 26, 2020

ICMLPO - on the International Situation - The workers and the peoples are bearing the brunt of the worst crisis in decades

Below is ICMLPO's analysis of the general economic and political world situation (the International Conference of Marxist-Leninist Parties and Organizations' website, in English, Spanish, and Turkish, is at:  www.cipoml.net/ ). 

In unrelated news Volume 2, No. 2 of Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity has been posted online at: redstarpublishers.org/TMLU.htm 

Also, workers are organizing at a Revlon lipstick factory in Oxford (in Granville County, northeast of Durham) where more than 30 workers had contracted the coronavirus as of about a week ago.  This is part of the Southern Workers Assembly's Safe Jobs Safe Lives essential worker organizing campaign.  Community supporters are welcome to sign a petition at:  bit.ly/RevlonSafety

ICMLPO – on the International Situation  

The workers and the peoples are bearing the brunt of the worst crisis in decades  

The world economy is trapped in a new capitalist crisis, which occurs within the framework of the general crisis that affects the existing system. This crisis is more acute than that of the years 2008-2009, which was more serious than that of the 1970s. It is a constant in the development of capitalism to go from one failure to another, in the midst of moments of crisis in which the main ones affected are the workers and peoples, because the wealth that they produce is always used by one or another sector of the owners of capital.  

In these crises all the contradictions of the bourgeois economy are manifested in a concentrated and violent way, the basis for their cyclical appearance is in the social character of production and the private, capitalist mode of appropriation of the products of the labour of the working class. In the present conditions of monopoly capitalism, because of the accelerated development of productive forces due to the intensified exploitation of surplus value to extract the highest profit and the competition ongoing alongside the monopoly, capitalist production has a tendency to develop rapidly and infinitely. However, the markets do not present a development which accords with this; they are limited and the rate at which the markets grow do not reach a level to meet the needs of the infinitely developing production. The finitude of the markets, as well as being related to the  consumption of the capitalists which are each other’s markets, since the luxury consumption of capitalists can be regarded as negligible in terms of magnitude, is mainly determined by the level of the consumption ability of the working class (and other labourers) –a significant section of whose labour power is seized without recompense – which stems from its position as the final and actual consumers of the produced products that can only be actualised by being consumed. When this discord between capitalist production and markets, the impasses caused by any reason in the processes of change necessary for production to take place through consumption go over a level where they cannot be “resolved” through market fluctuations or when they can no longer be deferred by being spread over time, the crisis erupts.  

For this reason, we can assert with confidence that the crisis of capitalism, in the final analysis, is caused by the following conflict: The insatiable thirst for wealth of the owners of capital leads to increased production and, with it, to the search for a greater mass of surplus value, which collides with the limited power of consumption of the workers, with which, the tendency to the unlimited development of social production collides with the limit of the consumption capacity of society. “The true limit of capitalist production is capital itself, it is the fact that, in it, capital and its own valorisation are what constitutes the starting point and the goal, the motive and the end of production; the fact that here production is only production for capital and not the other way around, the means of production are simple means to expand more and more the structure of the life process of the society of producers”[1], says Karl Marx.  

Due to the incidence of the Covid 19 pandemic, which acted as an external factor of global incidence, the crisis has occurred simultaneously in all countries and practically in all areas of the economy. The losses caused are reaching millions of dollars; there is an enormous destruction of productive forces as millions of jobs have been lost. The efforts made by the international bourgeoisie to avoid a more serious fall in the economy and to take the road to recovery are leading to the further impoverishment of the working masses, of millions of men and women who are facing unemployment and declining wages. They are also planting roots for a future fall in the world economy.  

Capitalist crisis and the pandemic  

The magnitude and extension of the crisis has been intensified by the occurrence of the Covid-19 pandemic, which forced the adoption of blockade measures, that is, the closure of companies, the paralysis of international trade and social confinement.  

Covid 19 was not the cause of the crisis, it acted as an aggravating factor of a phenomenon that was incubating. The world was already in a process of decreasing economic growth; some countries even stagnated, mainly in Europe. According to the World Bank, in its World Economic Outlook report, in 2018 the world economy had a growth of 3.0% of GDP, in 2019 it decreased to 2.4% and it projected growth of 2.5% for 2020. The biggest problems were in the main imperialist countries (except China), which were expected to have an average growth of just 1.4%, while the so-called emerging economies, in East Asia, the Pacific and South Asia, would have growth rates above the world average, 4.1%, 5.7 % and 5.5%, respectively. The International Monetary Fund was more optimistic, as it forecast world growth of 3.3% for this year. However, this forecast was questioned by a series of evidences such as the negative effect of the US-China trade war and the worsening of inter-imperialist contradictions, the worsening of relations between the US and its partners, the deepening of discontent and the struggle of workers and peoples in various regions of the planet.  

The official results of the behaviour of the economy during the first quarter of this year confirmed the seriousness of the problems: In the US it fell 4.8%, in Germany 2.2%, France 5.8%, Italy 4.7%, Spain 5.2%, China 6.8% (the first contraction in the last 40 years); Latin America reported a red balance, except for Colombia and Chile. The great fall of China had a quick recovery in the second quarter, 3.2% year-on-year, according to official data, above the forecasts that placed it between 1.5% and 3%, while the whole of the European Union had a collapse of 11.7%.  

The analysis of the indices of world industrial production and world commodity trade allows us to confirm that the current crisis was on its way.  

The growth rate of total world industrial production, which was 3.6% in 2017, decreased to 3.1% in 2018 and 0.8% in 2019. In the last two quarters of 2019 the growth rates, compared to previous quarters, are -0.2%, 0.3%. With the impact of the pandemic, especially in China, in the first quarter of this year there was a sharp fall, -4.2%, and in April and May, in comparison with the previous months, the growth was -8.5% and 0.8% respectively.  

The volume of world trade began its contraction in 2019, when the pandemic was not yet present and with it its contraction was greater. Its growth rate, which was 4.9% in 2017, decreased to 3.4% in 2018 and -0.4% in 2019 (negative growth, absolute contraction). The biggest problems began in the final two quarters of 2019, in the first quarter of this year the growth was -2.7%, and in April and May, compared to the previous month, these rates were -12.2% and -1.1% respectively.  

China does not escape this phenomenon, but its behaviour is different. Its fall is small between 2017 and 2019, going from 6.6% to 5.7%, but it suffers a sharp fall in the first quarter of this year, -12%, and in March a month-to-month growth of 16% is observed, in April 3.9% and in May 0.6%. The highest levels of decline are found in Latin America: -0.7%, -2.2%, -5.0% in the aforementioned years, and in April and May of this year -18.0% and 2.2% (in relation to the previous months) respectively.  

Since the previous year there had been a warning that a debt crisis could be looming. The ratio of world debt to GDP reached its historical maximum of 322%, equivalent to $253 million million dollars, a phenomenon that encompasses both the private and state sectors. Since the 2007-2008 crisis, the greatest growth in debt occurred in the non-bank business sector, which, due to the slowdown in growth in the economy, found it more difficult to repay loans. According to an OECD report, at the end of December of 2019, the global amount of outstanding debt from non-financial companies reached a record high of $13.5 million million, which was double that of December 2008 in real terms.[2]  

In 2019, the corporate bond stock compared with those existing in 2008 had doubled. The ranking of the ten countries with the highest nominal corporate debt is led by the U.S. and China, far above the rest. In the U.S., the debt reached 75% of the total GDP. In China, it reached 155%, in Japan it represents 101.6%, in France 154.1%, in Germany it is 58.9%, in the United Kingdom it has reached 79.1% of GDP. In general, the countries with the highest corporate debt are the largest economies on the planet.[3] One should note in this matter the "bad quality of the debt". For example, in the U.S., 75% of the debt is considered to be of this category, and the percentage could be higher because the companies that rate it have interests and agreements with the companies that are rated.  

With the bailout measures and loans implemented in these months to face the crisis, as well as the investments made to face health problems and social policies, the issue of public debt has taken on greater dimensions, reaching its highest level since the Second War World, for over 100% of GDP[4]. Therefore, the phenomenon of indebtedness –corporate and public – puts the bursting of this bubble at risk in a short time, with worldwide implications, since the international monopolies are immersed in this situation.  

The fear of the coming of the pandemic was expressed in different sectors: in the markets, the prices of shares fell abruptly from over-elevated levels; in credit markets, the differentials shot up in risky sectors such as high-yield bonds, leveraged loans, and the private debt. Then came the fall in oil prices on the international market due to the weakening of world demand and the struggle of interests among the main oil producers, such as the OPEC member countries, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States. It later began to rise again due to the increasing energy need of the capitalist wheel that began to turn once again as the measures for the pandemic were lifted and the US’ shale gas stocks were exhausted. At the base of this phenomenon is the overproduction of oil, which, for the first time, led to the establishment of negative prices for a barrel of oil. Prices in unit values of raw materials also fell, in April by 5.8% in the monthly relation with March, which already had a fall of -2.0%.  

The so-called emerging economies suffered a reversal of portfolio investment flows never seen before, both in dollars and as a percentage of GDP, which led to describing this situation as the perfect storm. Countries with weaker economies felt strongly the problems of the international market, the drastic fall in remittances and, in general, their condition of dependence on international finance capital.  

The paralysis of production and trade on a global scale caused panic in the stock markets, and the forecasts for economic growth went down. In April, there were concerns about the possibility of a large economic contraction of -3% in 2020, worse than that registered during the 2008 crisis, with constant warning that the scenarios could be worse if the pandemic and its effects were prolonged. In June, the World Bank stated that there would be a 5.2% contraction in world GDP in 2020, making it the deepest global recession in eight decades, despite unprecedented economic and social policies and measures.  

The IMF projections published on June 24 are somewhat "better" than those of the World Bank, since they speak of a decrease of -4.9% for 2020 and of a growth of 5.4% for 2021, of course if there are no aggravating circumstances in the course of the pandemic. The U.S. and the Euro Zone have the highest rates of decrease (-8.0% and -10% respectively), as well as Latin America and the Caribbean, -9.4%. China went through an important decrease in growth; it dropped from 6.1% in 2019 to the 1.0% expected for this year. It is the only imperialist country to show a positive rate.  

The 5.4% growth forecast for 2021 means that, globally, the GDP in the coming year would be about 6½ percentage points lower than the projections published in January 2020, but that the process of total economic recovery will be slow, taking maybe two or three years. The cumulative loss of the world economy is expected to be $12 million million dollars in the years 2020 and 2021; 10% of that loss will be in Latin America and the Caribbean.  

The possibility that the problems may escalate in the coming months and that the crisis may deepen must not be ruled out.  

Contradictions and inter-imperialist struggles  

In the context of the economic crisis and the global pandemic, inter-monopoly and inter-imperialist contradictions have been present. The spiral of threats, sanctions and accusations of espionage between the United States and China have continued, at times in a high tone and, at others, with an apparent relaxation. It is not a confrontation between democracy and authoritarianism, or between capitalism and socialism as some sectors present it, they are contradictions between the two main imperialist powers, which dispute the expansion and affirmation of their control in the markets and regions of the planet.  

The adoption of security measures by the main economic powers to control the contagion have not been distanced from political considerations, and in the investigations on the treatment and vaccines to face the Covid 19 the game of interests has been evidenced of the pharmaceutical monopolies and the imperialist states to which they are owed.  

Inter-imperialist disputes are far from the interests of workers and peoples, they cannot line up behind one or another power, under the mistaken assumptions that one or the other "more or less favours" humanity; moreover, the sharpening of the contradictions between the powers also engenders the danger of war.  

Response of the international bourgeoisie  

The international bourgeoisie has learned from past experiences and, on this occasion, it has adopted a series of measures to avoid a greater economic collapse and avoid the quick transformation of the discontent of the workers and peoples into major protests.  

The central banks massively injected liquidity, and governments established bailout policies, through subsidies, credits, and fiscal policies for the benefit of the monopolies and large companies, and to prevent mass bankruptcies. The amount of resources allocated for these purposes is enormous, unprecedented “in the rescue and fiscal stimulus programs, including salary supplements, licenses, loans and subsidies to companies, with an average additional expenditure equivalent to 5-6% of GDP, with a similar amount in addition to loan guarantees and other credit support for banks and companies”.[5]  

The dramatic situation imposed by the crisis and by the Covid 19 pandemic forced the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to change their discourse regarding the economic management of governments and the adoption of emergency measures. They spoke of the need to suspend the payment of the external debt by countries with weak economies and greater difficulties; they proposed the renegotiation of the processes with them, and a few countries "forgave" parts of the debt of the dependent countries. The IMF launched an urgent plan granting freely availability credits of $20 million million dollars to 96 countries with greater difficulties to access them.  

They also raised the question of the "need" to implement reforms "that allow capital and labour to adjust relatively quickly, speeding up the resolution of disputes, lowering regulatory barriers, and reforming the costly subsidies, the protected monopolies and state-owned enterprises that have slowed the development".[6] In some countries, special laws were passed to "flexibilize" labour relations, to legalize company bankruptcies and mass layoffs, to force the use of vacations, to reduce working hours and wages below the established basic wages, at the same time they established social programs as the creation of economic bonds and food kits for the poorest sectors.  

Despite the calls for prevention issued by organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) to protect life with isolation measures, the bourgeoisie forced the rapid incorporation of workers into companies in sectors considered non-essential, without, in most of these places, providing adequate biosecurity measures, causing an increase of the contagion, but also of the resistance and the protest from the workers.  

The workers and peoples are bearing the brunt of the crisis  

The main victims of the capitalist crisis and the Covid 19 pandemic have been, from the beginning, the working classes, the most impoverished sectors of society, mainly the youth. The actions taken by the bourgeoisie and its governments, despite some social policies (such as bonuses), are placing the burden of the capitalist crisis on the working class, the unemployed and the homeless. This is not a new phenomenon; it is a constant, part of the nature and the cycle of capitalist reproduction.  

Millions of men and women have lost their jobs, have suffered a reduction in their wages, have had to increase their number of work hours; millions of others, particularly young people, have seen their entry into the labour market closed.  

In the private and public sectors, the use of teleworking (working from home) has expanded, causing flexible hours, intensification of labour, in short, intensification of exploitation. Companies reduce their investments, workers cover production expenses that correspond to or are the responsibility of the companies, such as electricity consumption, internet, computers, telephones; the hourly workday is disappearing and its measurement is by objectives. For working women, it has been presented as a way to "reconcile work and family life", hiding the double working day and justifying the adoption of policies to cut social services, such as nurseries, etc.  

Thousands of companies have gone bankrupt and closed their doors; to avoid massive bankruptcies, the bourgeoisie adopted a reduction of working hours. According to the International Labour Organization (ILO), the global decrease in hours worked in the first quarter of 2020, compared to the last quarter of 2019, was equivalent to the loss of 130 million full-time jobs. For the second quarter, it calculated that the loss would be equivalent to 305 million full-time jobs.[7] At the end of the first semester, the ILO itself recognized that this figure amounted to 400 million, and that the most serious losses are occurring in Latin America (18.3%). For the last quarter of this year, under the most favourable scenario, it is estimated that, around the world, about 4.9% of working hours will continue to be lost (140 million full-time jobs). In the most unfavourable case (a possible second wave of the pandemic), there could be a loss of up to 11.9% of the working hours (equivalent to 340 million full-time jobs).[8]  

Women workers constitute the most affected sector due, in particular, to the effects of the crisis in the service sector and because they constitute a large part of those who work in the front line in the battle against the pandemic (especially health and social assistance sectors). Working women are suffering the lengthening of their working hours and the decrease of their income. Globally, almost 510 million women workers, 40%, carry out their work in the sectors most affected by the crisis.  

In general, those who are linked to the so-called "informal sector" have been the most affected. There are more than 2,000 million people in the world (62% of the total employed), who work in practically all sectors of the economy, from hotels, street trade, agriculture, etc. 1.6 billion of them were affected by the restrictions imposed to confront the pandemic.  

One in six young people in the world have lost their jobs since the start of the pandemic, and those who are still employed have seen their hours of work reduced by 23%. Young people have seen the destruction of their jobs. Three out of four young people active in the labour market work in the "informal sector"; therefore they lack social protection. This period has been very hard for young people: their jobs have been destroyed, they have faced obstacles to continue their education and their access to the labour market has been hindered.  

The current crisis is widening and deepening social inequities. The year 2020 will end with 71 million more people in conditions of extreme poverty, if the forecasts for economic growth are maintained with favourable factors; otherwise they would reach 100 million people, with which the world rate would rise to 9.18%, meaning the first increase recorded since 1998. The number of people living in poverty would increase by 353 million by the end of the year.  

It is mainly the poorest dependent countries that will suffer the increase in extreme poverty and general poverty; almost half of the new poor will be in South Asia, and more than a third in Sub-Saharan Africa.[9] Latin America and the Caribbean is the region most affected in terms of negative social effects; extreme poverty will grow from 67 to 83 million people this year, and its growth will be greater in urban rather than rural areas, also due to difficulties in production, decreases in the price of materials, problems in their economy; there is a risk of a food crisis.  

The impacts of the economic crisis on the workers and peoples are profound and lasting; they will be present long after the economic recovery begins.  

There is no doubt that the destruction of the productive forces that has occurred and continues to occur and the adoption of policies to get out of the hole in which the world economy finds itself, signifies an increase in the level of exploitation of the working class, of the oppression of the peoples. Once again the bourgeoisie has placed the burden of the crisis on the shoulders of the oppressed.  

The rapacious character of capitalism has been laid bare  

The development of this new economic crisis of capitalism, as well as of the Covid 19 pandemic and the measures that the bourgeoisie is carrying out to alleviate them, are provoking a many-sided questioning of the system of exploitation in which the workers and peoples live.  

Years of carrying out neoliberal policies that, among other aspects, led to the strengthening of the private health and social security systems – to the detriment of those of the public sector – to the carrying out of policies of labour flexibility, to the cutting of budgets for social programs, etc. have placed the burden on the poorest people in the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. They have been the main victims of infection and death, as well as of social confinement, the closure of companies and the measures adopted by governments to save the big business owners.  

The workers have seen millions of dollars go to support big business, while the support bonuses or other measures to mitigate the problems of millions of people without jobs and without food are barely crumbs compared to those,. The workers are receiving lower wages so that the big bourgeoisie can maintain its fortunes, in a world in which 1% of the richest people concentrate 82% of the wealth.  

Above all, there is a fundamental element that the entire world has seen: without the labour force in motion, without the workers in the factories and the peasants in the fields there is no production; without that work, society does not generate wealth!  

Among the bourgeoisie there is concern about what is happening, about the weaknesses that its system presents and the risk that situations such as those that are taking place today are causing to its stability and permanence. In their think tanks they create proposals that, in general, appear as innovations or reforms to make capitalism less savage, "more friendly" for the workers, peoples and nature; some speak of the need to adopt social policies for the future – similar to those applied by the Welfare State; others, on the other hand, appeal to the need to apply policies of force to contain the discontent and struggle of the masses.  

For millions of men and women, it is clearer that the bourgeoisie has in the State the instrument to protect its class interests, in those sectors they are developing the consciousness of the need to transform society. However, these steps taken in the development of the consciousness of the working class do not mean that the perspective of revolution and socialism is opened for all of them as an effective alternative to overcome the current state of affairs. The ideological influence of the bourgeoisie and opportunism is still strong in the workers’ and popular movement, and the capitalist crisis finds it affected by a great ideological and political confusion.  

In the same scenario of the crisis, facing the attacks of the pandemic and the devastating impacts of unemployment and poverty on the workers and peoples, the youth have expressed their opposition and rejection of the policies of States and the employers; they have come out into the street demanding their rights, in varying degrees, in almost all countries. Those expressions of struggle of the working class and peoples will grow and we proletarian revolutionaries must strive to be present, to point out the most right and correct paths, to play the role of organizers and leaders of the popular struggle. These battles are, by their content and objectives, expressions against capitalism, in opposition to its predatory and oppressive nature; they can and must advance to see the objectives of the revolution and socialism.  

Transform the discontent of the masses into organization and struggle  

The scenario opened up by the current crisis is creating better conditions to advance the consciousness, politicization, and organization of the working class, youth and peoples. We, the Marxist-Leninist parties and organizations, have a great opportunity to develop our work in this regard, to increase our forces in each of our countries, to expand the influence and organization of the International Conference of Marxist-Leninist Parties and Organizations among the workers and the peoples of the world. This opportunity represents a great challenge for the proletarian revolutionaries that we take up with conviction and courage to demonstrate the need for the revolution, to increase and develop our parties, to advance in the process of accumulating revolutionary forces.  

These purposes will be feasible if we deepen our ideological, political and organizational relationship with the working class, the youth and the peoples, transforming their discontent into organization and struggle, raising the fight against the measures and policies implemented by the bourgeoisie to unload the crisis on the workers and peoples. In each country, we have the responsibility to present proposals and programs to face the crisis – that respond to the interests of the workers and the peoples – that become the banners of the masses of struggle and serve us to demonstrate that the interests of the workers and the bourgeoisie are opposed and irreconcilable.  

The events that are taking place on a global scale confirm the Marxist-Leninist principles on the nature of the crises of capitalism, but also to confirm that their existence does not in itself determine the outbreak of the social revolution of the proletariat. It is essential to have a strong mass revolutionary movement, a great workers’ and popular movement that will fight against all forms of the exploitation and oppression of capitalism and will lead their struggles towards the establishment of the power of the working class and people. At the same time, the existence and action of the revolutionary political vanguard, sufficiently developed and rooted among the masses, is essential for it to completely fulfil the leading role in the revolutionary process. We must recognize that many steps need to be taken in this regard to achieve the victory of the proletariat over the owners of capital. The International Communist Movement has organizational expression in few countries and with limited influence. This situation must be overcome, and urgently.  

The fight for the seizure of power obliges us to make public, as widely as possible, our points of view, the new evaluations of what is happening in the world and what are its causes and beneficiaries. We must be active participants – with our Marxist-Leninist conceptions – in the political and ideological debate that has opened up regarding the permanence of current capitalism and the "changes" that sectors of the bourgeoisie are saying need to be made. Along with the perspective of the revolution and socialism, we need to present proposals for the material demands of the masses – immediate and medium term – that can become banners of mobilization and struggle, as is already happening in various regions.  

There is much talk of the advent of a "new normal", as if this would mean overcoming the problems that the world faces today and before the pandemic. However, they assume it based on the criteria that would be built on the same pillars of the outdated capitalist regime: on the exploitation of workers and peoples, the oppression of women, the depredation of nature, racial segregation, with certain modifications in the social behaviour. In reality, the international bourgeoisie seeks to take advantage of the current circumstances to find new accumulation mechanisms, that is, to take the exploitation of wage labour, the extraction of surplus value, to higher levels.  

We Marxist-Leninists seek a new order that means the revolutionary transformation of society, a "new normal" that arises from the negation of the past, with the birth of a new society, the society of the workers. Only socialism can build that new world.  

International Conference of Marxist Leninist Parties and Organizations ICMLPO  

July 2020  



[1] Karl Marx. Capital, Volume III, chapter XV.  

[2] See: The seeds of the next debt crisis, John Plender, March 16, 2020 https://www.expansion.com/mercados/2020/03/09/5e6578f4468aebff048b45b2.html  

[3] See: The 10 countries with the greatest corporate debt, Miguel Boggiano, December 16, 2019. https://www.ambito.com/opiniones/bonos/los-10-paises-mayor-deuda-corporativa-n5071402

[5] See: UK: wishing for a V-shape, Michael Roberts. July 10, 2020 https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2020/07/10/uk-wishing-for-a-v-shape/  

[6] World Bank.  

Sunday, September 06, 2020

FLOC: "NC Governor Cooper and Reynolds' Hypocrisy Demands a Strong Response" and NC Council of State forum

The Farm Labor Organizing Committee AFL-CIO is asking people to sign this letter demanding that Reynolds American negotiate with the union, take steps to reduce the danger tobacco farmworkers face from the coronavirus, and work to stop its suppliers from violating existing laws and labor agreements.  Besides endangering the workers, allowing the coronavirus to spread among farmworkers and denying adequate medical attention increases the risk for everyone.

See:  actionnetwork.org/letters/reynolds-can-save-lives-during-this-pandemic?source=direct_link&

"After six months of refusing to help farmworker communities, Gov. Roy Cooper [a Democrat, up for re-election this year and in the national news recently over the Republican National Convention in Charlotte, etc.] confirmed he will not do anything to help growers and workers cope with the pandemic. The same Governor who in 2017 met with the NC Farm Bureau but refused to meet with FLOC before signing S615, which targeted FLOC and stripped rights from farmworkers to join and form unions [ https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/politics-columns-blogs/under-the-dome/article184853933.html?link_id=1&can_id=746ac0676c1f5c05d7883f6be6ff0a2f&source=email-nc-gov-cooper-and-reynolds-hypocrisy-demands-a-strong-response&email_referrer=email_911609&email_subject=nc-gov-cooper-and-reynolds-hypocrisy-demands-a-strong-response ].

When the Pandemic began hitting our community, we never thought the State government would do much and instead FLOC launched an aggressive program equipping members on hundreds of farms with supplies donated by supporters and used our collective power to ensure paid leave, medical access, and other protective policies were uniformly enforced.

An all too common story is that of Julian, an H2A worker who worked for a non-union labor contractor and contracted COVID in the workplace but wasn't provided with medical attention or [transportation] until FLOC provided it. After testing positive, he wasn't paid the required paid leave and was eventually forced by his employer to return to Mexico without appropriate medical attention and in debt, while his employer continued as normal, sending other sick workers to Mexico and simply replacing them.

Thousands of workers face significant barriers to testing and medical care, no paid leave, unsafe working conditions, all in the supply chains of some of the wealthiest corporations in the world like Whole Foods and Reynolds American. 

The Governor and many politicians refuse to look at the agricultural supply chain and understand that while growers and workers struggle in this economy and this Pandemic, wealthy corporations like Reynolds American take advantage, squeezing cheap agricultural products out of us and refusing to take responsibility for the abuse in their supply chain or the serious danger their inaction puts on the farmworkers that make their wealth with our sweat.

We're calling on Reynolds American to finally take action and sign an agreement with FLOC that includes funding for improved housing, transportation, and paid leave to save lives in their supply chain. Please sign in support. Hasta la victoria!" [#BoycottVUSE]

Hear from candidates for commissioner of labor, agriculture, etc.

Farms, Food, and Hunger: A Conversation with the Candidates will be Wednesday, September 9th 7 - 8:30pm on ZOOM, with candidates for NC Commissioner of Agriculture (including Steve Troxler and Jennifer Wadsworth), NC Labor Commissioner (including Josh Dobson and Jessica Holmes), lieutenant governor (including Yvonne Holley), and Superintendent of Public Education (including Jen Mangrum and Catherine Truitt).  Listeners will be able to submit questions and there will be Spanish translation.  This non-partisan forum is hosted by the Carolina Farm Stewardship Association, Feeding the Carolinas, MomsRising, NC Alliance for Health, NC Rural Center, and the Rural Advancement Foundation International - USA.   See:  bit.ly/FarmFoodHunger and www.facebook.com/events/3314782091914447 

Blogger changes

Also, this month Blogger/Google changed the format of its user dashboard (the reader experience seems to be unchanged), making it much more difficult to use, like Wordpress.  Hopefully it will get easier to use over time.  It was possible to switch back in August, but not now.  This isn't the reason there haven't been any recent posts this summer, though just writing this using the new system is a lot of trouble.

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

New Evidence of Trotsky's Conspiracies published

A new book by Montclair State University (New Jersey) professor Grover Furr has been published, discussing evidence provided by newly declassified Soviet documents from the 30's that Trotsky and associates conspired with the Nazis, Russian fascists, and leaders of the Red Army to gather intelligence, carry out sabotage and assassinations in the USSR, and weaken Soviet defenses against German and Japanese aggression.  This is the first time several of the included Russian documents have been made available in English.

For more information about this book and others in English, see:  msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/twelve-book-flyer.pdf

His twelve books in English on Soviet history are available through Amazon in the US, UK, Canada, Spain, France, Italy, and Germany.  For information about many translations, articles, press interviews, etc., see his website:  msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/    

Some of his books are available through www.erythrospress.com/ and redstarpublishers.org/ and may be available through other retailers and in libraries.

In separate news, a new issue of Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity has been published and will be available free on Red Star Publishers' website, as are the back issues; see the previous post for the contents.