THE STRUGGLES OF
THE
WORKING CLASS
AND
PEOPLES,
AND THE
ANTI-IMPERIALIST DISPUTES
The prolongation of the war in Ukraine, which has now
lasted more than a year and a half, is the main evidence of the
intensification of inter-imperialist contention. Russia, the United
States and NATO all have in this conflagration the location of the
most important projections of their future in international
geostrategic control.
To this corresponds the extraordinary investment of
economic, military and human resources, and that is still not enough
for them and they insist on the need to raise them in all meetings
and forums on both sides.
But this war is not the only one in the world, nor
the only form of inter-imperialist contention. The trade war is
intensifying and subsiding as the situation favors one or another
power, one or another economic or military bloc, without the
struggles and strife between the members of the same bloc
disappearing, as is the case with the countries that make up NATO.
This feverish dispute is spreading to all corners of
the earth, it manifests itself in the fueling of local conflicts, the
encouragement and support for bloody coups d'état, such as what
happened in Niger and Gabon on the African continent, the scene of
various and recurrent conflicts.
"We are living in a
world conditioned by the ups and downs of the confrontation between
the imperialist powers and their economic and military blocs and
pacts ," said the
ICMLPO in the May 1 Manifesto .
The inter-imperialist war that is taking place in Ukraine
is an expression of this, but
it is
not its only manifestation. Localized armed
conflicts are
under way in other countries,
trade wars,
military apparatuses and armies
are
being strengthened, there are disputes for economic and political
control of the entire planet. The inter-imperialist struggles,
particularly the one between the United States and China, warn us of
the danger of a world-wide conflagration."
The
repercussions of this intensification of inter-imperialist contention
are manifold. In the economy, in addition to the serious effects on
the countries directly involved in the armed conflict, its
repercussions are evident on a global scale.
The economic downturn is seriously affecting China,
with major repercussions on its exports and imports, which have an
impact on the international economy.
The harmful combination of economic stagnation with
high inflation rates is another effect, present mainly in the United
States and Europe, but also in several countries in Latin America and
other regions of the world.
However, the main impact is suffered by the workers
and peoples, mainly in the countries of the imperialist NATO bloc.
The increase in war budgets and "aid" to the Zelensky
regime, public subsidies to the financial sector to prevent its
bankruptcy, among other aspects, have impacted and continue to impact
the economy of those at the bottom, with the increase in energy
prices and the fall in the purchasing power of wages. The
precariousness of work, the dismantling of public services and the
regressive reforms to social security have been some of the
consequences of the actions of the imperialist bourgeoisie, to place
the cost of its war on the backs of the workers and peoples.
The working class and peoples are responding to the
offensive of capital
The most important struggles in the world that have
taken place in recent times have been led by the working class and
broad working masses.
"Now
is our
time!
“In
all countries the demands for higher wages and better working
conditions have begun to grow: mobilizations, strikes, demonstrations
have increasingly become the
way to
impose
themselves on the bosses. It is a tendency,
with
different levels and rhythms, that can be seen in all countries; the
class struggle, the strength of the workers
when
they fight together, the importance of the working class, have become
more and
more affirmed", says
the Communiqué
of the European
section of the ICMLPO.
It is referring to
the powerful actions of struggle developed in France where, under the
slogans: "No
to 64
years",
"Enough
is enough, this time it is
no",
"No
to exploitation,
no to work to the
grave",
were
promoted since the beginning of this year against the increase in the
retirement age of workers.
But also there were repeated
actions that took place in Germany, Italy, Spain, Denmark, Norway,
Turkey, etc.
Meanwhile, in England, on
February 1, a media outlet described:
"Schools closed,
trains were paralyzed, officials were absent from multiple
ministries. On Wednesday, the United Kingdom saw its largest day
of strikes
in eleven
years with stoppages in many sectors, united by the demand for higher
wages against an inflation rate of 10.5%.
“Some 20,000 schools
in England and Wales were affected by the first
of seven days
of strikes called for February and
March by
primary and
secondary school teachers ,
adding to protests that began months ago in many other sectors.”
Even in the United States, countless workers' strikes
were joined by writers, screenwriters and actors in the lucrative
film industry.
In Latin America, multiple and repeated actions are
developing throughout the region.
The
popular rebellion in Peru stands out for its magnitude, in response
to the parliamentary coup that removed Pedro Castillo from the
government and replaced him with Dina Boluarte. It reached great
levels of breadth, radicalism and persistence for a period of 2
months. Only the ferocious repression that claimed the lives of more
than 60 combatants, together with the blatant support of US
imperialism and the right-wing governments of the region could –
momentarily – break the rebellion.
In most countries of the region there have been
multiple expressions of protest in which the role of the working
class has been clearly highlighted, but they have also had the
incorporation of broad sectors of the popular camp.
Ecuador, scene of great class
battles
Our country is facing an acute economic, social and
political crisis. The impossibility of the bourgeoisie as the ruling
class to provide an solution and respond to the fundamental needs of
our peoples has led to the increase in poverty and extreme poverty,
high unemployment and the accelerated concentration of wealth in the
hands of the big bourgeoisie.
The presence in Ecuador of the most important
international drug trafficking cartels, connected at different levels
with State institutions, has precipitated an unprecedented
institutional crisis, political instability and the increase in crime
and insecurity in the country.
These factors have determined a complex scenario in
which the class contradictions between the bourgeoisie
and the
working class and other
exploited and oppressed classes
are expressed and
exacerbated, as well as the inter-bourgeois contradictions that have
acquired particular significance.
In this scenario, the popular camp, with the action
of the working class, broad strata of non-proletarian workers, the
indigenous movement, youth, women and sectors of small and medium
producers, has played a fundamental role in multiple and significant
actions of struggle.
On June 13, 2022, the popular indigenous strike began
and lasted for 18 days, winning a victory with a decrease in the
prices of gasoline and diesel, the non-expansion of the oil
exploitation, the prohibition of mining concessions in protected
areas, among other gains.
"The massiveness of
the struggle was accompanied by its combativity,"
says comrade Guido Proaño in the pamphlet:
The June strike, eighteen days to
win a victory. The mass
movement has learned from its own struggles and this was expressed in
the struggle in the streets, in the
building of barricades, the
use of mechanisms and instruments of protection and self-defense,
mass actions in the cities, the seizure of governorates and
institutions, the closure of main roads to affect the productive
apparatus. the blocking of cities
taking over key points, the organization of relays, the assembly of
logistics to sustain the fighters in the capital."
This momentous battle was not the only one. In
multiple and repeated days of mobilization and struggle, the working
class, mainly grouped in the organizations that make up the United
Workers' Front, has shown its opposition to the attempts of the
neoliberal regime of Guillermo Lasso to impose privatizations of
strategic areas and social security, of wanting to implement labor
flexibility, as a supposed pillar to confront unemployment.
The day of mobilization on May Day 4 months ago took
place in 50 cities of the 24 provinces of the country, reiterating
the firm position of the working class, leading the popular camp in
the complex scenario of political and institutional crisis that
confronts Ecuador.
Of course, the camp of the social and political
struggle in our country has incorporated multiple sectors affected by
the action of the big bourgeoisie in power. Rice producers, dairy
farmers, banana growers, Popular Front organizations, peasant social
security, university students have been involved. Of particular
importance was the struggle promoted by the teachers grouped in the
National Union of Educators, who broke the arrogance of the
government and won the right to equal pay.
The very episodes of the development of the political
crisis, with the impeachment of President Lasso, the declaration of
cross-death [in which the president can dissolve the assembly] and
the early elections, have not only been expressions of
inter-bourgeois contradictions, but also a consequence of the high
and persistent levels of combats of the working class, the indigenous
movement and other popular sectors.
The struggle in the streets and squares, the strikes
and roadblocks has been combined with the presence of the electoral
contests.
In opposition to the different alternatives of the
bourgeoisie, the revolutionary left and the popular forces have
contested the different areas of representation in local governments,
in parliament and even in government with their own alternatives.
In the recent early elections, in addition to the 6
presidential candidacies of the bourgeoisie representing different
tendencies of the right and so-called progressivism, the popular and
left alternative was presented by Yaku Pérez for the Presidency,
with the alliance "Claro que se puede" [Certainly we can].
We were in the front row of the contest until the
terrible assassination of candidate Fernando Villavicencio. This
reprehensible event shook the political scene and favored the two
alternatives of the bourgeoisie, which will contest for the
government in the second round. Neither of them are an alternative
for the working class and peoples of Ecuador.
By way of conclusions:
The revival of the struggle of the working class at
the international level affirms the validity of the fundamental
contradiction between capital and labor, between the working class
and the bourgeoisie.
The recent experiences of struggle of the working
class confirm Lenin's theses of the obligation of revolutionaries to
participate and get involved in the big trade unions or trade union
federations and to fight for the consciousness of the great working
masses.
It has also been shown that in the multiple battles,
the working class does not act alone, that broad strata of working
people are incorporated who, without being strictly part of the
working class, are victims of the capitalist system and of the
policies of the imperialist bourgeoisie and its natural ally, the big
bourgeoisie in the dependent countries.
In several Latin American countries , indigenous
peoples are playing an important role in driving the social and
political struggle.
A prominent role has been played by youth and women,
who are incorporated and involved with determination in all these
struggles.
However, the multiple actions of struggle carried out
on an international scale also reveal their limitations that prevent
this potential from being projected in a meaningful way to the
struggle for revolutionary transformation, for the overcoming of
capitalism.
These limitations are seen, on the one hand, in the
weaknesses in mechanisms of coordination and unification in the most
important moments of the struggle.
The lack of a clear political goal that articulates
and projects these struggles is one of the most important and evident
limitations, which prevent this struggle from being linked to a
project of change, to a revolutionary channel.
Of course, when we speak of these limitations it
would be wrong to hold the working class and the working masses
responsible for them. It is necessary to take up the new and great
challenges that are presented for revolutionaries, for
Marxist-Leninist parties, to improve and expand our activity to place
ourselves at the height of the current development of the class
struggle, and to lead that process and lead the social struggle into
the revolutionary channel, to the struggle for political power, for
the revolution and socialism.
August 1, 2023