Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Taking on the Global "Torture Taxi" Hub in North Carolina

Confronting the CIA's International System of Kidnapping and Torture

 

Last fall a large protest kicked off a national campaign to stop Aero Contractors Ltd., a North Carolina-based company accused of being the leading Central Intelligence Agency front company for the rendition of disappeared, or kidnapped, people.   Extraordinary rendition is the policy of sending captives to other countries where they can be tortured or killed, keeping American hands clean.  According to Robert Baer, a CIA case officer active in the Middle East until 1997, "If you want a good interrogation, you send them to Jordan.   If you want them killed, you send them to Egypt or Syria.   Either way, the US cannot be blamed as it is not doing the heavy work" (Guardian/UK "Afghanistan: 'One Huge US Jail,'" online at www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0319-07.htm ).  Rendition is happening in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Jordan, Egypt, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Diego Garcia (a British colony in the western Indian Ocean) and elsewhere.   US and UK military sources say there are 10,000 "ghost detainees," people kept secretly, probably along with a larger number who are detained less covertly.   After September 11th, eight secret prisons were created, according to the Washington Post (WP, November 2, 2005).  Increased judicial oversight of the Guantánamo Bay, Cuba prison makes rendition an appealing alternative for the US government. This practice started in the 1970's when South Americans were captured and returned by the CIA to their countries of origin for punishment.   The US isn't alone in practicing rendition. 

 

The US indirectly uses torture through rendition (which also involves inhumane treatment or torture during the rendition process).   The US also tortures people directly, as a policy, and Aero Contractors is part of this.   In Afghanistan there is ample evidence that torture techniques, including those from Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, are being used:   shackling, hooding, electrical shocks, whipping, mock executions, sexual humiliation, and starvation (according to the Guardian/UK article). November 18, 2005 ABC News (see also abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=1322866) reported that the CIA also uses waterboarding, torture in which a wet cloth is used to suffocate a victim or the victim is placed on an inclined board with plastic wrapped over their mouth while water is dumped on them (similar to feudal Europe's method).

 

The Origins of Aero Contractors

 

Aero Contractors, Ltd. is an actual company, and allegedly a major part of the rendition network, which includes the Camp Pearl Military Reservation ("The Farm"), in Virginia close to Williamsburg; Florida's Bob Sikes Field (run by CIA associated Tepper Aviation); and Dulles International Airport in Washington.   The Company doesn't advertise and allegedly gets all of its business from the CIA, the military, and maybe from other departments.  Aero told the Global TransPark, a North Carolina state operated airport, that the Company serves Federal "security agencies."   Aero Assistant General Manager Robert W. Blowers told the New York Times (NYT) that "We've been doing business with the government for a long time, and one of the reasons is, we don't talk about it." According to the NYT Aero carried CIA officers who parachuted into Afghanistan in 2001 and it flew a team to Karachi, Pakistan after its American embassy was bombed in 2002.  An Aero plane flew from Libya to Guantánamo in 2004 the day before Libyan detainee Omar Deghayes said he was questioned by four Libyan intelligence officers ( NYT, May 31, 2005).  Aero told a North Carolina CBS station that it has one classified government contract, involving Ft. Bragg, but leases the alleged planes only for domestic flights.   The Company says the activist group Stop Torture Now (STN) is ill-informed, but Aero cannot reveal its work ( www.wral.com/news/5355295/detail.html and www.wral.com/news/4265910/detail.html).   

 

Aero's blue main hangar, at the Johnston County Airport (JNX), in eastern North Carolina, is secluded at the end of Charlie Day Street (named for a mechanic who worked on covert flights to Laos during the Vietnam War).   Its business address is 3463 Swift Creek Rd. Smithfield, NC 27577.  The Company has operated at the Airport since leasing eight acres in 1979.   The NYT (May 31, 2005) alleges that Aero operates at this airport because it does not have a tower from which Aero could be spied upon.   Officially Aero provides "aircraft rental with pilot" (NYT, May 31 2005).  Aero is able to modify the a plane's equipment, make repairs, and it provides pilots.   Reportedly it is the main operator of CIA airplanes.  It got the planes in question from five companies that were allegedly CIA fronts.  Aero claims that it no longer leases the planes anti-rendition activists referred to, and those companies no longer exist.  

 

In 1979 Aero was created by former CIA officer and Air America primary pilot Jim "Peg Leg" Rhyne (he died in 2001).   Rhyne lost his leg to anti-aircraft fire in Laos.   Air America was the CIA's airline during the Vietnam War and was linked to illegal drug transport.   In 1976 Air America was dismantled and replaced by at least 12 companies.  The NYT calls Aero "a direct descendant" of Air America (May 31, 2005).   Aero's president is Stormin' Norman Richardson, who is primarily involved with the Stormin' Norman chicken-and-ribs business in Kelly, North Carolina.   Assistant Manager Blowers is Aero's contact person and appears to be the main operator.  

 

The Company has actual board members who have meetings.  Former Navy pilot and American Legion national commander William J. Rodgers of Maine is an example.   According to an ex-CIA and Air America employee, "It was very, very easy to find patriotic Americans who were willing to help" by pretending to be in charge of front companies ( NYT, May 31, 2005).     

 

Aero's role after 9/11    

 

According to the recent Guardian/UK article (March 19, 2006), Massachusetts based Premier Executive Transport Services (later renamed Bayard Foreign Marketing, LLC) was a Delaware incorporated CIA front operating at the Johnston County Airport.   According to a St. Louis Indymedia article (November 19, 2005), Premier has long been identified as a front.  A Gulf Stream V Turbo Executive jet Aero leased from Premier has flown from Johnston County to pick up and render disappeared persons from Gambia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sweden, Italy, Germany, Ireland, and Spain ( WP, November 16, 2005, and NYT, May 31, 2005).  It is thought that no CIA prisoners are kept in Johnston County.  As of March 2006, the jet had been used at least 75 times, which is known from observations at airports and a senior official in Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate.   According to St. Louis Indymedia the plane's tail has been labeled N44982, N379P, and N8068V at different times.  Its serial number is 581.  

 

This plane was first noticed October 23, 2001 when it stopped in Karachi, Pakistan at 2:40am to pick up Yemeni microbiologist Jamil Qasim Saeed Mohammed, arrested by the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate for alleged involvement in the attack on the USS Cole.  

 

December 18, 2001 the plane picked up two men at Bromma Airport in Stockholm, Sweden.  One was Ahmed Agiza, an Egyptian asylum seeker who had been living with his wife and children in Sweden for three years.   The other detainee was Mohammed al-Zeri, also an Egyptian. Agiza was able to tell his family that he had been arrested, but no more than that.  The two men were shackled and blindfolded for the drive to the airport.   There their clothes were cut off and they were handcuffed.  They were given sedative suppositories and put in plastic diapers.   By 3am they were in Cairo where they were kept alone in underground cells.   The Human Rights Center for the Assistance of Prisoners in Cairo says "Agiza was repeatedly shocked, hung upside down, whipped with an electrical flex, and hospitalized" after being forced "to lick his cell floor clean," reports the Guardian/UK. As of March 2006 Agiza was still in an Egyptian prison and al-Zeri was in Egypt under house arrest.  

 

January 10, 2002 the jet was in Halim Airport in Jakarta, Indonesia to pick up Egyptian Mohammed Saeed Iqbal Madni, allegedly an accomplice of shoe bomber Richard Reid.   The Human Rights Center says he died under interrogation in Cairo.  In June 2002 German citizen Mohammed Zahar was taken from Morocco to Syria, and has not been heard from since.  

 

The CIA's archipelago of fronts for rendition

 

Aero also operated a leased a Boeing Business 737 jet (N4476S, serial number 33010), supposedly given up recently.   Nonetheless, Aero still spent $2 million dollars to build a 20,000 square foot hangar at the Kinston Regional Jetport (airport code ISO), which has the 11,500 foot runway needed for the 737 the hangar was built to house, according to the Kinston Free Press and the Goldsboro News Argus newspapers.  The 737 was kept in the open at the Global TransPark, next to Kinston Regional, prior to the construction of the hangar. According to the November 19 St. Louis Indymedia article (see www.stlimc.org/newswire/display/947/index.php ), the jet is probably the one (serial number 33010, N4476S) formerly owned by Keeler and Tate Management, LLC, an alleged front company based in Nevada.   Incidentally, the address and phone number of that company was that of former Senator Paul Laxalt, Reagan "First Friend."   The jet was seen in Prague in 2005 and it left from Spain the day after the Madrid train attacks in March 2005.   STN member Stephanie Eriksen's says that the Boeing has flown 9 times to Kabul, 13 times to Jordan, 3 times to Kuwait, 7 times to Morocco, 5 times to Pakistan, 11 times to Libya, and 10 times to Baghdad.    These and other CIA planes have flown many times from Dulles International Airport in Washington DC to several Middle Eastern locations, for example after the capture of Saddam Hussein and the capture or assassination of al-Qaeda officials ( NYT, May 31, 2005).      

 

Allegedly the Boeing and the Gulf Stream had been given up by November 2005 (WP).  Reportedly they were leased for about a year in 2002 or 2003 and given up in March 2004, to be replaced by turboprop airplanes.   Aero allegedly has or had about 20 planes, possibly obtained from some 27 CIA owned planes (including the Boston Red Sox's executive jet, which is heavily involved in rendition), and another 26 or so Cessnas - small turboprop airplanes.   In 2005 the NYT said Aero owned at least 26 aircraft, 10 bought since the beginning of the "War on Terror" in 2001 (May 31 article). 

 

The NYT says the CIA uses seven fronts that apparently have no management or staff, and exist only to own aircraft.   Other planes are chartered from apparently real companies that are CIA connected, such as Aero, Pegasus Technologies, and Tepper Aviation in Florida.   Most of the fronts are permitted to land at military bases and at least eleven of these shady aircraft have landed at Camp Peary, the home of a CIA training facility, the Farm.   Most CIA traffic goes to and from Johnston County.   Allegedly many of the CIA's planes are based in the coastal plain of North Carolina and Virginia.   Alleged front companies Aviation Specialties, Inc, Stevens Express Leasing, Inc, Devon Holding and Leasing, Inc, and CIA contractor Aviation Worldwide Services/Presidential Aviation frequently fly to Johnston County.   For more information see chapelhill.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/17197.php.  Aero leased aircraft from Premier, Stevens Express Leasing, Inc., Devon Holding and Leasing, and Keeler & Tate Management, LLC.  Stephanie Eriksen points out that CIA fronts can be tracked by looking an records of companies allowed to land on military bases (see http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGAMR510512006 ).  Planes can be tracked by seeing what company buys them before their identification numbers are changed.      

 

The CIA has apparently been sloppy with some of its apparently non-existent executives.  For example the NYT found that Premier officer Philip P. Quincannon is also an executive of Crowell Aviation Technologies, which shares the same Massachusetts address as Premier, and Stevens Express Leasing, based in Tennessee.   Quincannon's only records are PO boxes in Washington and Dunn Loring, Virginia, and a social security number incongruously created in Washington in the mid-90's, though he was supposedly born in 1949 (May 31, 2005).    

 

You too can spy on the CIA  

 

It is possible to observe these planes and listen to their communications with traffic controllers.  It is legal to listen in with a regular receiver, but not to report the contents of the conversations.   The Johnston County Airport radio frequency is 122.8 MHz and the Raleigh controllers are on 125.8 and 125.3 MHz.  Aircraft at the Kinston Jetport might use the 120.6, 122.95, 121.9, 120.6, 127.33 , 127.3, 122.15, 135.5, and 272.75 MHz channels (St. Louis Indymedia).  Most airport frequencies are listed at www.airnav.com).  The N serial numbers on CIA planes are changed often to confuse observers.   A former CIA pilot told the NYT that "Sometimes a plane would go in the hangar with one tail number and come out in the middle of the night with another (May 31, 2005).   Still, these companies apparently can't be kept very secret.   1970's CIA general counsel Lawrence R. Houston said that in the airlines "everybody knows what everybody is doing, and something new coming along is immediately the focus of a thousand eyes and prying questions.  I don't think you can do a real cover operation" (NYT, May 31, 2005).         

 

Taking on the Global "Torture Taxi" Hub in North Carolina

 

Friday, November 18, 2005, around 6am more than 60 people gathered for the first protests of the anti-rendition campaign.   There were three protests that day, two around the Johnston County Airport and one at the Johnston County Courthouse.   One group performed street theatre all morning on Business Highway 70 about half a mile from the Airport.   Another group went up to Aero's huge blue hangar and put up a sign reading "Aero Contractors:   CIA Torture Taxis" over Aero's sign.   They wanted to lower its US flag to half staff, but it was locked in place.  Some protesters wore orange prison jump suits with black hoods.   Chapel Hill activist Peggy Misch says "Burma-Shave type" sequential signs were placed along Business 70 to condemn torture.  "This Way To CIA Torture Flights" was another sign.   Protesters came from Selma (in Johnston County), Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Charlotte, Fayetteville, and from St. Louis, Chicago, and elsewhere.   The Aero protests were covered briefly in the Raleigh News & Observer (N&O) and on ABC's local news.     

 

Fourteen people were arrested for trespassing at the hangar.  Johnston Co. Sheriff's Deputies arrived in force just after the protest began, having been notified of the protest in advance.   Josh McIntyre tried to deliver a nine-page citizen's indictment for international and US law, Geneva Convention, and UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment violations.   He was met at the door by a "jittery" man in a uniform brandishing a taser stun gun (Independent Weekly, November 23, 2005, online at www.indyweek.com/durham/2005-11-23/first.html).  The man refused to take the indictment, so it was left on Aero's doorstep.  Before being arrested around 6:30am, the protestors sat in a circle and prayed.   The activists also read from social justice texts, mainly religion based, including a quote from Dorothy Day, co-founder of the Catholic Worker movement: "Our problems stem from our acceptance of this filthy, rotten system."   People outside of the property sang "We Shall Overcome." 

 

Those arrested included eight from the Triangle (Raleigh and west), five from St. Louis, and one from Chicago and are aged 17 to 66.   Kathleen Kelly (founder of Voices in the Wilderness) of Chicago, Marty King, Mark Chmiel, Bill Ramsey, Andrew Wimmer, and Diane Lee of Missouri, and Scott Langley, Gerald Surh, Josh McIntyre, Dante Strobino, and Stephanie Eriksen of Raleigh, Deborah Biesack of Fuquay-Varina, and Patrick and Bernadette O'Neill of Garner were the defendants.   The bail was set at $500 dollars for local defendants and $1000 dollars for those from outside the State, which Patrick O'Neill calls "absurdly high bonds for second-degree trespass, a very minor charge" (November 23 rd Independent).  Local ACLU lawyer Michael J. Reece, working free of charge, got the bails halved and the Aero 14 were freed by 5pm that day.  

 

On November 18th citizen's indictments of Aero were also presented to the Johnston County Commissioners.   Chairwoman Cookie Pope said the Commissioners would examine the issue but would probably leave it alone.   She told the N&O that "When you talk about the CIA, I leave that to the CIA" and "I don't try to tell anyone how to run their business."   Sheriff Steve Bizzell and County Manager Rick Hester met with the group, the Sheriff escorting the activists inside the Courthouse. The Sheriff acknowledged that it was a peaceful demonstration - "But I would not sit idly by and let any group intimidate our citizens or trespass on our businesses."   About 50 people took part in that demonstration.   

 

Some are supportive of Aero because it employs 100 people and pays the airport about $300,000 dollars a year in rent and fuel fees (filling about a third of the airport's budget, though CBS says Aero has an independent fuel source).   Airport manager Ray Blackmon, who was in the military for 27 years and Airport manager for 16 months by the time, said "They're [Aero] good tenants, I hope they're here for a long, long time" ( N&O, November 19, 2005).  Citizen's indictments were also delivered to the Airport Authority and Aero's Board of Directors.  These downtown activists also stayed in solidarity until the arrested "Aero 14" were released.              

 

According to the N&O (November 19, 2005), locals the reporters spoke to were sympathetic to the CIA.   Reporters spoke to a woman cook, age 50, at a Citgo station near the first vigil, who said "I just think they should keep the media out of the war and let the boys do what they need to do and come home" and a 58 year old man in camouflage who said "I don't think the CIA is doing anything worse than al-Qaida is doing, cutting off heads and putting it on television, walking into hotels with bombs strapped to them."   Aero Assistant General Manager Robert Blowers, on staff since 1994, dismissed the allegations:  "It's an old story, and it's been beat to death" ( N&O).  Surveys conducted this spring by activists found that Johnston County residents are opposed to rendition and torture.         

 

The action was organized by the Center for Theology and Social Analysis, Stop Torture Now (formed in St. Louis, but now also organized in NC, website:   www.stoptorturenow.org ), CodePink, Voices in the Wilderness, the Durham and Orange County Bill of Rights Defense Committees (BORDCs), the NC Council of Churches (NCCC), and others.   It was originally suggested by St. Louis activists at the annual Southern Life Community Retreat, a meeting of religious social activists in North Carolina.  

 

The protest was planned to be the day before the annual protest of the School of the Americas (now called the Western Hemispheric Institute for Security Cooperation) at Ft. Benning, Georgia.   WHISC trains Latin American soldiers and many of its graduates have committed human rights violations and crimes against civilians in their home countries (see www.soawatch.org for more information). 

 

The Trial of the Aero 14

 

January 5th the Aero 14 were tried before Judge Robert Ethridge, a black Republican who reportedly rarely acquits.   The defendants appealed to necessity - the concept of breaking the law to prevent a greater crime.    Josh McIntyre said "I entered the property for the sole purpose of preventing a larger and more serious crime.   We were all there to expose to the greater community a violation of international and national law."   Bernadette O'Neill (age 17) said "As a Christian, my faith requires that I take a moral stand when I see injustice happening.   We had to risk arrest in order to expose the crimes of our government and the shameful role that a Johnston County business is playing in this criminal activity."   Stephanie Eriksen said "You have to stand up to voice what the victims of torture are denied.  After all, they are often denied due process.  I am obligated to speak up for them; it is my duty as a citizen.   It would be dishonest and unjust for me not to do so." 

 

UNC Law School professor emeritus and president of the ACLU in the 60's Daniel Pollitt and civil rights activist, theologian, and the late Baptist Rev. W. W. Finlator testified as experts.   Pollitt has argued a necessity defense before the Supreme Court and lower courts many times.  Eriksen says "The prosecutor was prepared but no match to our two witnesses."   The Judge did not see the applicability to this case of opposition to the segregationist Jim Crow laws.  He said the defendants could have merely written letters in opposition.   Scott Langley, a Catholic Worker who protested at Guantánamo with his wife before the trial, questioned Detective Brandon Harris at the trial:

 

"In general, as an officer of the law, would you pursue investigations if allegations of a crime were made?"

"Yes sir."

"Is there and investigation underway of Aero Contractors based on our allegations?"

"No sir."

"Are you aware torture is a crime and is illegal under our constitution and international law?"

"Yes sir."

 

The defense argued in part from the Bible, Rev. Finlator arguing that it "has a bias in favor of justice," but the Judge then cited Scripture in sentencing.   Ethridge said that he believed in the Bible and Jesus, but that the Bible says to obey the law and does not "excuse criminal activity" (November 25 Independent).   Eriksen said Ethridge seemed to consider finding them innocent but instead repeated his points and found the fourteen guilty under State law. He said it was not a crime of necessity.   Eriksen reports that the Judge said "I am not going to tell you what this means, you are going to have to ask, I am going to continue your judgment and assess your court cost."    

 

All were sentenced to suspended sentences, 10 days probation and fined $50 dollars and $110 dollars for court costs, but their appeal vacates their sentences.   Patrick O'Neill has more than 5 prior convictions (level three, more than four prior arrests), so he also received a 20-day prison term, a fine, and a year on probation.   Eriksen was sentenced to a 10 day jail sentence and one year probation (level two, more than one prior arrest).   O'Neill and Eriksen risked incarcerating if the 14 had lost their appeal.   A new jury trial, possibly before the Superior Court, was scheduled for July 31st, but it has been cancelled, so the protestors will not be punished.   The State might not have wanted to pay for it or give the defendants further publicity.

 

Eriksen calls the action "a truly rewarding and enlightening experience" and is hopeful that Aero can be stopped.   She says police were all "cordial and respectful" and "They were fascinated with our charges.   They were so different from anything they had seen, a far cry from the drunks and murderers that they are used to. The prosecutor dragged this out more than it needed to be."  

 

Protesting Aero at the State Owned Global TransPark

 

The day after the trial many of the same people and others (about 30) protested at the Aero hangar in the Global TransPark, part of the Kinston Regional Jetport.   The hangar was roped off with yellow crime scene tape and the sheriff's deputies were asked to investigate.  Activists examined the area, leafleted, and tried to deliver an indictment to the Airport's director.   The director was in his office alone, but supposedly in a meeting. No one was arrested, since the Sheriffs Department was given notice beforehand and Aero allowed the protest.   There were sharpshooters on the Airport roof and in the parking lot.   Eriksen was interviewed for the 6pm news on the local NBC station.  The Global TransPark is a State owned airport that was built to facilitate economic development, but has not lived up to expectations.   Indictments were also presented to the Governor's office ( Independent, January 25, 2006).     

 

The NC Stop Torture Now group met April 5th for about 45 minutes with (Democratic) Governor Mike Easley's Chief of Staff, Franklin Freeman.   They were reportedly stonewalled, though it was a "polite" meeting, according to Joan Walsh, of the Durham BORDC.   The Executive Director of the NCCC, George Reed; Walsh; Johnston County activist Allyson Caison; Bill Towe and Christina Cowger, of Peace Action; and lawyers Steve Edelstein and Vanessa Lucas, of the firm Edelstein & Payne were at the meeting for the anti-torture group.   This meeting was arranged after many calls from STN members and with the help of State House member Paul Luebke.  STN asked that the State Bureau of Investigation examine the allegations against Aero Contractors and that Aero's lease be cancelled if the allegations were proven.   Freeman said Aero has a lease for at least twenty years, which the State might not be able to cancel, and that Aero owns its hangar.  The group suggested that the contract might be voided if Aero is acting illegally or immorally.   Freeman again tried to divert the issue to the Federal government, saying that Congress could stop funding the project.  He was asked to place Aero on the GTP Board's agenda, but said it might not be possible since Gov. Easley is only formally on the Board and does not participate.   The person in charge seems to be Vice-Director Eugene Conti.  Freeman did not comment on STN's assertion that this could be bad for the Governor's poll numbers.   The following Friday, April 7 th, there was a protest by about 15 people from 4-6pm at the Governor's Mansion in Raleigh. 

 

May 1st five members of the Durham and Orange BORDCs met with Rep. David Price (Democrat) regarding Aero.   Price is the only representative from North Carolina to have co-sponsored Rep. Edward Mackey's February 2005 House Resolution 952, outlawing rendition "to countries where torture or otherwise inhuman treatment of persons occurs."   Last year six NC representatives voted against torture: Democratic Reps Butterfield, Etheridge, McIntyre, Miller, Price, Watt, and Walter Jones, a Republican.   This is despite Etheridge's role in the fall of 2005 in getting the Federal government to provide $650,000 dollars to help pay the $9 million dollar cost of expanding the Johnston County Airport.   STN is also speaking to State legislators.  

 

May 2 there was a daytime Global TransPark Board of Directors meeting, which about 23 activists attended.  Protesters carried signs such as "Stop Torture.   Investigate Aero" and "Stop CIA Torture Flights." A press conference was held outside.  Cowger said that "Our tax dollars are being used to support an infrastructure that is providing for activities that are not supported by most of the American people."   Marine Iraq War vet Jacek Teller said that the majority of soldiers want to act legally, can handle alleged terrorists lawfully, and that the soldiers are endangered by US support for torture.   Demonstrators were allowed into the meeting, where they unfurled a sign, which had to be put away.  They then revealed t-shirts against Aero worn under business clothes ( www.wral.com/news/9148674/detail.html?taf=ral).  After being refused early in the meeting, three people were allowed to make a very short presentation to the Board before being stopped.   No one answered the demand that the Board end Aero's lease if it is found to be acting illegally.   Vice Director Conti stated to the Kinston Free Press diplomatically that: "We are not investigators but we do appreciate the concern and comments of these citizens."   During the Clinton Administration Conti was a Department of Transportation Assistant Secretary and he was director of Erskine Bowles' Senate campaign in 2000.  Reportedly some Board members looked uncomfortable being confronted with these allegations.   GTP Authority Director and former Kinston City Council member told the paper that: "I didn't like the way they disrupted our meeting. They didn't come before us with any facts" ( Kinston Free Press , May 3, 2006).  STN urges people to contact Governor Easley and the Board members (see below or www.stoptorturenow.org for information; the Governor's information is listed after the State workers article in this issue).  At a later meeting, TransPark Executive Director Darlene Waddell argued that those protesting Aero would reduce employment in eastern North Carolina.             

 

STN has begun a "listening project," in which Johnston County residents are asked what they think about rendition, torture, and the alleged local connection.   The main purpose is to learn residents' attitudes in order to lobby the County government.  The first survey was April 17th and STN members interviewed 103 people, 10 of whom wanted further information.   Another 33 people were approached but refused to comment.  Another survey was May 20. Fewer people were questioned, but the results were similar.   In both cases, about 2/3rds of the people surveyed, once they understood the questions, were against rendition and torture and felt that the County should not allow Aero to lease space if the charges are true.  

 

Recently the State Democratic Party passed, without needing debate, a resolution against US torture, which mentioned Aero Contractors.   Previously anti-torture resolutions were passed by several Democratic bodies in the State, including the Demoratic Party branches in Durham, Orange, and Wake Counties.     

 

About 15-20 STN activists, mostly from the Triangle and Johnston County, have been demonstrating against Aero every second Saturday of the month since December.   The site is high-profile, at the wedge where US Highway 70 and Business 70 split, about four miles south of Clayton.  The vigil attracts a lot of attention and many drivers honk in support.   On one rainy Saturday this spring a woman stopped and gave the vigilers an umbrella.  She thanked them for drawing attention to the issue and said that she had relatives in the military.   There were about 15 people at the February vigil, 22 in March, and 13 in April because many regulars were out of town.  

 

European investigation of, and complicity in, US rendition

 

Spain, Germany, and Italy are examining whether their airports are used in torture rendition.  Sweden, Norway, and the European Parliament began investigating allegations of torture after public pressure ( WP, November 16, 2005; on the European Parliament investigation see www.statewatch.org/rendition/rendition.html ). 

 

Germany is investigating the case of citizen Khaled el-Masri, who was allegedly disappeared while vacationing in Macedonia and tortured for five months in Afghanistan.   el-Masri was taken from a bus at the Serbia-Macedonia border December 31, 2003 and held for 23 days before being drugged and beaten for a flight to Afghanistan. The day before his passport was given a Macedonian exit stamp Aero's Boeing Business Jet landed in the Macedonian capital of Skopje, before flying on to Baghdad and Kabul.   It was parked a kilometer form the airport terminal and Macedonian security personnel were not allowed onboard the plane, which was considered US territory.   At the time the jet was numbered N313P, but later it was sold to Keeler and Tate Management and is now numbered N44765.   el-Masri was let go in the mountains of Albania, on the order of then national security Adviser Condolezza Rize because he was not the person wanted by the US.  This was after he started a hunger strike and was force-fed nasally, and after being told by his captors that they knew he was innocent but that only high officials could order his release.   George Tenet, then CIA Director, was aware of his detention.  Reportedly the German government, if not others, knew what was going on and did nothing (Reuters article online at www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1205-09.htm)

 

Italy tried twenty-two alleged CIA agents for the February 2003 kidnapping and torture in Egypt of fundamentalist Muslim cleric Abu Omar (Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr), of Milan.   Germany is investigating this same case because the cleric was brought to German's Ramstein Air Base for transport to Egypt.  It was seen as unlikely that the CIA would be forthcoming, so convictions were unlikely.   Prosecutor Ebehard Bayer told the Post that "If it is true that these are CIA people, I can hardly imagine that the CIA would allow its people to be extradited" (WP, November 16, 2005).   The Berlusconi government most likely knew about the kidnapping, and later excused it, although it hurt an Italian investigation (Los Angeles Times, online at www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1230-06.htm). 

 

Omar was abducted off the street by unknown men according to an eyewitness.  He was then interrogated at an Italian air force base in Aviano before being flown to Egypt where he was tortured.  

 

He was flown to Egypt on a Gulfstream model 4 jet, which is also used by the Boston Red Sox's manager.  The jet is owned by Albany, New York based Assembly Point Aviation and possibly based in Johnston County, NC (according to Stephanie Eriksen).   Its serial number is 1172 and it has been identified as N85VM and N227SV.  It has also flown to Germany, Afghanistan, Ireland, Morocco, Dubai, Jordan, Japan, Switzerland, Azerbaijan, the Czech Republic, and 51 times to Guantánamo Bay (see Knight-Ridder Tribune Newspapers article online at www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0320-04.htm ).   

 

After public pressure, Spain is trying to find out why CIA planes landed more than twelve times in the Canary Islands and Majorca.   A previous finding that no prisoners were involved in the Majorcan flights is being re-examined.   Interior Minister Jose Antonio Alonso said that "If it is confirmed that this is true, we would be facing very serious acts that would break the rules concerning the treatment of people in any democratic system.   They would be very serious and intolerable acts" (Washington Post, November 16, 2005).  

 

Human Rights Watch says that countries such as Austria, Canada, Germany, Georgia, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK also attempt to send suspects to countries where they could be tortured.  

 

Denmark (also Ireland) protested use of their airspace by the CIA.  In March 2004 a CIA plane stopped for 23 hours at Copenhagen's airport for an unknown reason, leading the Foreign Ministry to ask that the CIA not use Danish airspace for secret renditions or "purposes that are not compatible with international conventions" ( WP, November 16, 2005). 

 

Swiss prosecutor Dick Marty reported to the Council of Europe January 22, 2006 that his investigation found that six CIA aircraft made 800 rendition trips (see www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=57336 ).  Amnesty International counts almost 1000 rendition flights plus another 600 using planes that are officially acknowledged as having been used by the CIA at some point ( www.oneworld.net , April 7, 2006).  The CIA told the Post (November 16, 2006) that rendition only occurs in friendly countries and with the permission of the host country's intelligence officials.            

 

The Bush Administration and torture  

 

It is illegal to torture and rendered detainees often disappear permanently (see also the Alliance! article on Guantánamo, at www.allianceml.com/paper/july2005/alliance.htm).  Some people have apparently died while being tortured with American involvement.  Rendered detainees are not able to contest their arrests in court and their whereabouts are unknown to the public.   It has been proven that many of these detainees are innocent of involvement in terrorism.  American use of torture and rendition make the new revelation of the use of the CIA's secret prison network an important issue.   It has already been revealed that the US operates several Guantánamo sized prisons for detainees, for example in Haripur and Kohat in Pakistan's North West Frontier Province.  

 

Only low ranking US soldiers have been tried and punished for torture, while forms of torture and inhumane practices are official policy.   Army Chief Warrant Officer Lewis E. Welshofer, Jr. was let off lightly after torturing Iraqi Major General Abed Hamed Mowhoush to death.   In April, Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported that since late 2001 more than 600 soldiers and civilians have been accused of involvement in the mistreatment or torture of more than 460 prisoners.    HRW says that apparently only about half of the charges have been fully investigated.  Only 40 have been sentenced to prison, and all but 10 to less than a year, which HRW calls light punishment for at least some of the crimes.   Only three officers have been convicted for prisoner abuse.  Of about 20 civilians, including CIA agents, reported to the Department of Justice, only a contractor has been indicted ( www.commondreams.org/news2006/0426-03.htm). 

 

The McCain "Torture Ban" does not ban all torture and actually encourages it in some ways.  Even so, Bush in signing it claimed that he is not bound by Congress on this issue, under the "unitary executive" theory (see the above tomdispatch.com article).  Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has also opined that the Constitution does not apply to US personnel operating outside of the country, so treaties and laws are moot.

 

Local Information:      

 

The Aero vigils at the split of US 70 and Business 70 are held at 2pm the second Saturday of every month.  There are carpools at 1pm from Brightleaf Square in Durham, following the weekly anti-war vigil, and from Falconbridge in Chapel Hill.   .

 

NC Stop Torture Now meets in Raleigh every two to four weeks, usually on a Sunday afternoon. 

 

For STN phone contacts about the above events and contact information for the GTP Board email southplumb at gmail dot com.  

Friday, June 30, 2006

Scott Mill rezoning request decision deferred to August

Monday the County Commissioners decided to postpone making a decision about the development until August to allow the owner to consult with the community. From what I've heard, this isn't likely to be done in good faith by the developer.  This news was briefly reported in the Herald-Sun on Tuesday, the 27th in the Durham section headline article "No Tax Increase in Approved Budget."  Another development decision up for discussion was also postponed at that meeting. 

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Readings for July Marxist Forum

The next meeting, on monopoly capitalism and
imperialism, will be on Saturday, July 22nd,
1:30-3:30pm at the Chapel Hill Public Library (near
University Mall), in the conference room.

It might be helpful to read the rest of Marx's Value, Price, and
Profit, though it might not come up directly (the
first 7 sections were suggested for the last meeting).
Imperialism:  The Highest Stage of Capitalism, is a
major work on this subject.  My edition has 123 pages,
but unless we have more than one meeting on this,
reading the entire book (but the most important chapters for this
meeting are probably chapters 1-5, 7, and the last
chapter) will be useful for this meeting.  We will
probably focus on the economics of imperialism at the
July meeting and look more at the superstructure and politics of
imperialism later.  It is probably still in print from
International Publishers and it is online at
www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/index.htm.
The Marx reading is also available at
www.marxists.org .

Monopoly Capital, by Paul Baran and Paul Sweezy, is
about American monopoly capitalism and was written in
1966.  I haven't read it, but it looks informative and is
recommended by a member, so it is something we might
want to read later and regarding other subjects.  The chapter on
"The Giant Corporation" would be useful for the July
meeting.

As practical example of monopoly we could look at
short article from a few years ago on how
Smithfield Foods is an example of monopoly capitalism.
Smithfield Foods is a mainly pork producing company
and is illegally and violently opposing unionization
of its huge pork processing plant in Tar Heel, North
Carolina.  The article is available online at
www.allianceml.com/paper/2004/carolinas .  For more
recent updates, covering the labor and environmental
situations, see
www.allianceml.com/indexpages/whatisnew.html and the
links are under the current issue, labeled as a series
on monopoly and agriculture.  There is also an article
on the unionization struggle at Case Farms, a chicken
processor, in western North Carolina.

Imperialist capitalism will come up again in future
meetings, such as on the national question and the
origins of capitalist wars, so we could look at other
parts of these readings then.

I'll send out updates by email and at
durhamspark.blogspot.com .  You can participate without
reading everything, and we can decide by email if the
readings should be reduced.  Feel free to publicize
the meeting, and I will make a flyer and notify some
calendars and media.  Maybe we can have 6 or more
people come in July.  

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Suburban development is a democratic and environmental issue

Since I created this blog I've been unsure about the focus and how much time I could put into it.   I wanted to focus on local issues and to show the local aspects of global issues, but it has been easier to write about national and international policies.  It seems like it is easier to find information online about issues at those scales and the political lines often seem clearer.  For example, I think it is clear that the US is treating detainees wrongly and illegally and that very few people benefit from the unjust and illegal Iraq War.  These issues are covered in many other places on the Net, so it is more useful and unique to look at local issues.  Supposedly 'all politics is local,' so talking about local issues more might be a way to reach more people.
 
In southern Durham, and elsewhere around the Triangle, suburban sprawl is a major issue.  I care about the loss of natural areas and farmland, but it seemed too local and not a big progressive, anti-capitalist issue.  It could also be knee-jerk, since I would rather keep the trees we have then see a nearly treeless St. Lawerence or Centex development carved into a forest or field.  Besides being an environmental problem, it affects how people travel, the school system, our taxes, and local weather.  Now I am seeing that it is often an issue of democracy and illegal actions.  For these reasons how development occurs is an issue progressives (especially Marxists) should organize around more.  After all, communists should try to reach people, especially workers, in the suburbs and rural areas, not just people in urban areas.  Small farmers and workers have many issues in common, which was the basis for the alliance of the working class and the peasantry in the USSR (symbolized by the sickle and hammer) and other socialist countries.
 
The specific issue I am thinking of now is the proposed Scott Mill development on Scott King Rd. between Grandale and Herndon Roads, near the American Tobacco Trail.  The site is at the very southern end of the County on a peninsula of uplands jutting into a large area of protected bottomlands along Northeast Creek.  A survey of the lands affected by Jordan Lake in the late 90's found that that area is possibly the best example of that kind of forest in the State and there are populations of rare Lewis' heartleaf and Indian physic growing there.  The Scott Mills site has already been clearcut around an old farmhouse, but development would probably result in silt and other water pollution and reduce and degrade habitat.  The light and noise pollution from a development would harm some species.  Even small clearings in a forest have affects.  For example, cowbirds, which are native to the Midwestern praires, moved east as forests were cleared and even a trail is enough of a clearing for them.  Cowbirds harm other birds by tricking other species into raising cowbird chicks instead of their own, which the cowbirds usually kill.  Trees even far from a forest edge are at risk from being blown down in storms due to that edge, so shrinking a forest should increase wind damage (for example, I think clearcutting resulted in the storm toppling of two very big Willow Oaks near where I live). 
 
Besides these environmental issues, the developer (actually a middleman) has ignored the concerns of the public, acted in bad faith, and has a history of ignoring environmental laws.  The Planning Commission even recommended unanimously that the rezoning request for this development not be approved.  The development would no doubt increase traffic and construction traffic would damage nearby roads.  The neighbors are tired of construction noise.  A subdivsion might also cut off a potential hiking trail, linking the Tobacco Trail to other trails, along the high-tension powerline corridor running through the site and beyond RTP and Jordan Lake.  There is much more to say about this.    
 
The final decision about the current development plan will be sometime after 7pm on Monday, June 26th, at the County Commissioners meeting in the old Courthouse at 200 East Main Street. 

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Marxist Forum meeting set for July 22nd

The next Triangle Marxist Forum meeting is tentatively scheduled for Saturday, July 22nd 1:30-3:30pm in the conference room (downstairs from the lobby, to the left). 
 
The topic of the meeting is monopoly capitalism and imperialism.  I'm not sure about the readings yet, but they will probably include some of Imperialism by Lenin (which could still be in print and is probably available online at www.marxists.org or elsewhere online).  The rest of the last Marx reading would be useful to read, but I'm not sure that it will come up directly.
 
At the last meeting we had 5 participants (and almost another person), and two new people.  We started with the Lenin reading and then discussed some issues from the Marx reading or contemporary events, such as why groceries are cheaper in Brazil than in the Triangle and recent US economic history, and a study outline (the question of how a market does not gear production to meet demand).      

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Discussion Saturday moved to 4-6pm

I didn't realize that the Carrboro Book Fair, a progressive annual event organized (?) by Internationalist Books, would be June 3rd when I scheduled the next TMF meeting.  I was able to move the meeting to 4-6pm Saturday at the same place.  At the last minute we also tried to get room at the Fair for a Marxism discussion.  I might table at the event.  The meeting might have at least 5 people based on replies to my announcements.  I'm depending on the Independent and online resources for publicity, and this is another not very much publicized meeting unfortunately.      

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

Marxist Forum information

The next Triangle Marxist Forum discussion will be
about what capitalism is and how it works.  It will be
Saturday, June 3rd 1:30-3:30pm in the conference room
downstairs in the Chapel Hill Public Library (100
Library Dr., off of Estes Dr. on the north side, very
close to the intersection with East Franklin St.).

For readings, I suggest the next section from Lenin's
The Teachings of Karl Marx (or just titled Karl Marx)
-Marx's Economic Doctrine, covering value and surplus
value.  Also Marx's Wages, Prices, and Profit in vol.
2 of his Selected Works (or Value, Prices, and Profit
in vol. 20 of his Collected Works).  My course outline
suggests pages 103-149, but that is kind of long, so
we could look at about half of it in June, up to
Section 7.  It is available online at

We could look at the rest next time or move on (the
next outline focuses on macroeconomics, monopoly
capitalism, and imperialism).

I'm still looking for a short article illustrating
these ideas currently.
 

Thursday, May 18, 2006

The history of CIA torture techniques

This is the article I mentioned a few months ago, covering some of the history and development of American "soft torture" techniques.  It is chilling and heinous what they did (and may still be doing) to people.  It is by Rebecca Lemov and was published November 16, 2005, by Slate magazine.    
 
A Wikipedia article about Cardinal Mindszenty is available at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindszenty .  If he was tortured, it was wrong, but you can see that he was right-wing and would have had reasons to oppose and possibly act illegally against left governments.  Lemov tries to link this to the "Russians" and "Communists" but gives little information to prove that this was a systematic practice of the officially Marxist-Leninists states.  He sounds like a reactionary cleric, too reactionary even for the Vatican in the 60's, who made at least one anti-semitic statement (blaming the Jews for revolution in Hungary), according to a brief Web search.  He was reportedly an enemy of the Hungarian Bolsheviks after WWI and the "communist" Hungarian government after WWII (whether it was ML or not is another question, and it could have been ultra-left to attack the Catholic Church), but also an enemy of the Arrow Cross (?) Hungarian fascists during WWII.  This is based on just a little research, mainly through Wikipedia, though, so I could be wrong about the historical context.       
 

The Birth of Soft Torture

CIA interrogation techniques—a history.

By Rebecca Lemov
Updated Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2005, at 5:07 PM ET

In 1949, Cardinal Jószef Mindszenty appeared before the world's cameras to mumble his confession to treasonous crimes against the Hungarian church and state. For resisting communism, the World War II hero had been subjected for 39 days to sleep deprivation and humiliation, alternating with long hours of interrogation, by Russian-trained Hungarian police. His staged confession riveted the Central Intelligence Agency, which theorized in a security memorandum that Soviet-trained experts were controlling Mindszenty by "some unknown force." If the Communists had interrogation weapons that were evidently more subtle and effective than brute physical torture, the CIA decided, then it needed such weapons, too.

Illustration of an experiment run by Hull at Yale on university students in 1937.


 

Months later, the agency began a program to explore "avenues to the control of human behavior," as John Marks discusses in his book The Search for the Manchurian Candidate. During the next decade and a half, CIA experts honed the use of "chemical and biological materials capable of producing human behavioral and physiological changes" according to a retrospective CIA catalog written in 1963. And thus soft torture in the United States was born...

The rest of the article is available at www.slate.com/id/2130301?nav=nw

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Is the USA fascist?

What kind of a threat to democracy and the working class is Bush?  Have we passed from bourgeois democracy to a kind of
fascism or more authoritarian bourgeois democracy
under GW Bush or his predecessors?

I have my doubts about this, but the American system is definitely becoming more like fascism and maybe we are very close to a qualitative
change, if it hasn't happened already.  Marxist-Leninists (and everyone else too) should discuss this so we can analyze whether it has happened
already or how we will know American fascism when it appears.

Some Evidence

Some evidence is in the news every week (see www.votetoimpeach.org, www.afterdowningstreet.org, www.impeachbushcheney.net, www.commondreams.org, www.counterpunch.org , etc.), but the 2000
election, 9/11, and the 2004 election aspects are not.  I have not read in detail about the elections, but what I have read shows that the elections could have been stolen with electronic voting machines that do not leave paper trails, and there is evidence that this happened, such as the astonishing discrepancies between exit polls and the 'actual' results.  The Supreme Court in 2000 gave Bush the victory, while saying that this is not a legal precedent.  I thought Congress was the body charged with deciding undecided presidential elections (but I'm not sure about this).  Along with Bush's undemocratic methods and actions like lying to Congress and the people (a neo-conservative tactic), smearing opponents, excessive government secrecy, claiming divine inspiration, often ignoring Congressional and public pressure, and enriching friends and the rich in general, and the reactionary nature of the Republican Party (chauvinist, fundamentalist, and often racist in part, if not in whole, such as regarding Latino immigrants and Muslims) there are even more clearly fascist doctrines.  These include the idea of a unitary executive, having all powers not granted to Congress, that Bush is Commander-in-Chief of the country, not just of the military, claiming that fighting his "War on Terrorism" justifies ignoring the law, and his many signing statements, such as the one on the McCain 'anti-torture' rule, saying that he did not feel bound by it.  The Bush Administration didn't do all of this by itself, and some of these things aren't necessarily fascist, but taken together they are very undemocratic and against the Constitution and law regulated representative government.      
 
David Ray Griffin in "The New Pearl Harbor" and
Michael Ruppert in "Crossing the Rubicon" (his website is www.fromthewilderness.com) argue
persuasively that the US government was involved in
the 9/11/2001 attacks.  High level and active
involvement in allowing and carrying out the terrorist
attacks seems likely.  There are various revisionist theories (not all meant to fit together into a new story of 9/11) using physical evidence (such as that the WTC towers could not have collapsed due to jet fuel fires, that the three WTC collapses looked like controlled demolitions, that Flight 93 might have been shot down, and that a missile or small aircraft hit the Pentagon, not a jetliner, etc.), documentary or other evidence (such as hinderance of investigations that could have exposed the plot, several war games were going on that allowed the hijacked planes to reach their targets, evidence that US leaders expected the attacks and lied about this, a CIA official meeting with bin Laden after he was decalared to be a terrorist, etc.), and following the money trails (Pakistani intelligence financing of al-Qaida, huge futures trading spikes indicating that someone expected exactly what happened, who benefits from the attacks, etc.).  You can learn more through www.911truth.org, the 9/11 truth movement's website.  Right now I'm going through the
9/11 Commission Report for the official version of what
happened; it of course basically ignores and does
not address the idea of a governmental conspiracy.
Under revisionist theories 9/11 was hidden terrorism
by the government to justify its planned actions, like
the Operation Northwoods plan to create a pretext for
attacking Cuba in the 60's.  This isn't the open
terrorism by the most reactionary sections of the
bourgeoisie mentioned in Dimitrov's (?) definition of
classical fascism, but it would be a very different
strategy for the US government since WWII.

Ruppert's book links Wall Street, illegal drugs, the
CIA, Peak Oil (permanently declining oil production),
9/11, and Bush domestic and foreign policies.  It
might sound too conspiratorial, but it is interesting
and he provides seemingly good arguments and evidence
(as much as someone outside of government can know).
He argues that the government knows we are facing an energy crisis, so it staged 9/11 to provide
justification for seizing oil supplies.  He argues
that the anthrax attacks and alleged assassinations
(such as the plane crash of Paul Wellstone of
Minnesota) have basically ended Congressional
resistance except for token resistance by people such
as Cynthia McKinney (D-GA).  He provides a chilling account
of what the Patriot Act and other laws make possible,
such as the deportation of American citizens,
dictatorial emergency rule, and imprisonment for refusing
potentially unsafe vaccinations.  It sounds like the
framework for political fascism is already here, but
not openly in action.  We would disagree on
some things; for example, imperialism theoretically
could involve many kinds of resources, not just energy
supplies).  What he says about bioweapons is
interesting but he didn't provide many details about
the idea that the elites actually want to reduce the
world population with disease and that seems overly
conspiratorial and not in the interests of the
bourgeoisie outside of war.  The bourgeoisie has allowed millions to die of starvation, preventable diseases, "natural disasters," etc., why would it need to use biological weapons now? 

I have the impression that this goes back to the 70's
and 80's and has gotten worse since the 90's.  I
noticed that in Howard Zinn's "A People's History of
the U.S. he refers to a bipartisan consensus since the
70's or 80's.  I want to look at this more in the future, to see how we got to today, but also how the Democrats are as bad for the working class as the Republicans and what capitalist faction each party serves.  The Democrats have obviously enabled Bush and they often work for similar goals.  Maybe there is a difference between
corporatist economic fascism, which could already
exist here, and political fascism, which is not in
place yet.

Counter-Arguments

It is hard for me to call this fascism when things don't
seem greatly different now and they aren't like the
classical fascist systems (or are the US and those
states alike already?).  Bush serves business
interests very openly, but government institutional
control of the economy has in a way decreased since
WWII.  The economy is still regulated as it was in the 30's, but there has been deregulation, the creation of loss of profit lawsuits by free trade agreements, less drafting and enforcement of health, safety, and environmental rules, etc.  It is hard to believe that American fascism
started before the 70's, since the 60's were supposed
to have seen an expansion of democractic rights.  I know of an ML who I think argues that FDR created fascism, if I understand his position.  I think historian Karl Polanyi argues that everyone in the 30's was reacting to similar economic changes in somewhat similar ways, which is why we need a good definition of fascism, since most or all of the major powers (Germany, I assume Italy, though it became fascist in the 20's, the USSR, the US, and Japan (maybe in the 20's also), changed greatly during the 30's.   
It is valid to argue that it isn't
fascist since there is still basically freedom of
speech and protest and impeachment and censure can be
advocated in Congress.  
 
Average people probably
consider the charge of fascist extreme (and the
Republicans argue this already), and it is too easy a charge
to make if you are already fed up with government
policies.  Being able to call the USA fascist is
like calling your opponent evil, so if it isn't
obvious people will think we are crazy.  I myself am
suspicious of people saying the US is already fascist
or a police state, because it ignores shades
of gray and they usually don't define their terms.
 
Some people
are repressed, but from my position it seems like the
exception, not the rule. On the other hand, non-whites
are said to be repressed routinely, but not for
directly political reasons.  In a way prisoners in
the "War on Drugs" are very much political prisoners, though.

Would the American people accept Bush being an open
fascist, such as by suspending an election without having
an event like 9/11 happen again?  On the one hand
there might be a massive, grassroots revolt, but if
the military supported Bush maybe there wouldn't be enough
resistance to stop it.  If it were seemingly
legitimate we could have a situation like Germany in
the 30's when the Social-Democrats had weapons and
numbers to resist but didn't because the Nazis gained
power relatively legitimately.  Because the opposition
hesitated, they were neutralized, though I can't
remember whether they were disarmed first or somehow
just gave up and lost the organization to fight back.

What Do We Do to Stop Bush?

Then there is the question of what to do about this. If there were an election a logical step
seems to be refusing to accept it, following the
example of the US-inspired protests in the former
USSR.  We don't have enough support to follow the
examples of Bolivia and Nepal right now, but we can
work on that before 2008.  The public expects this approach and I think impeachment and using the law is still a way to go, though Republican (especially Bushist Republican) control of Congress does make impeachment harder to achieve. 

Locally I am working on a group lobbying for
impeachment (website
www.impeachbushcheney.net and unofficial blog
downingstreetactionnc.blogspot.com).  Rep. David Price seems to think Congress has become
passive and stifled, but he won't directly support
impeachment or push for binding Congressional
investigations that could lead to impeachment.  He has
supported letters asking for explanation of the
Downing Street memos and for an independent special
counsel on the NSA's warrantless wiretapping, but this
requires Bush to create an investigation of his own
policies (and was of course rejected, the White House
calling for investigation of who leaked the program's
existence).

I organized a petition campaign and so far the Grass Roots Impeachment Movement has
organized 4 town meetings, with up to 150 participants
(to the capacity of the city hall).  April 27th we had
a meeting in Durham.  Democrat Kent Kanoy (www.kanoy4congress.org) ran in the
May 2nd primary in part for impeachment.  He beat the
more conservative Democrat, but received far fewer
votes than our current representative, in a primary
that I've heard had about 1% turnout.  Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and maybe Durham next, have passed impeachment resolutions and it is
possible for state legislatures to force discussion in
Congress (and three are considering
this).

The local movement is mainly white, older, and the
usual leftists, so we need to work on that.  Speakers
at the Durham meeting and possibly at the other town
meetings linked impeachment to social demands and
pointed out that the Democrats as a whole have
supported Bush's policies, which could broaden our
support and points out the truth about the Democrats.  The Marxist-Leninist Organizer (some pamphlets available at www.mltranslations.org) has a very good general proposal on a working class approach to impeachment, though things such as anti-unionism are not unconstitutional (unless the US has ratified international treaties on it perhaps)
The movement is mainly composed of Democrats, but we
have contact with socialists and the Green and
Libertarian parties.  We haven't reached out to
anti-Bush Republicans yet (according to national polls
they do exist, and in relatively large numbers).

So, what do you think about the idea that the
US is fascistic and what we can or are already doing
about it in practical terms?

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Mother's Day - an anti-war day of action!

Mother's Day is usually treated today at best as a day to honor individual mothers, but it began as an anti-war event.  Some groups, such as Code Pink, sponsored anti-war events to mark Mother's Day 2006.  This link to a 2003 article I found at www.commondreams.org gives a brief history of Mother's Day.  There are also articles on the site on anti-war actions marking the day this year.  The Stop Torture Now vigil this month in Johnston County just happened to fall on Mother's Day Weekend, but it fortuitously fits the occasion.   
 

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Thoughts on the Durham May Day forum

The Re-Imagining May Day / International Workers' Day community forum the evening of May 1st went well but was not as big as the organizers had hoped.  It was at the Friends Meeting House on the Duke Campus, which is a nice space, but would have been very cramped if lots of people had turned out.  Nicole Rowan of the Durham People's Alliance spoke on May Day history and passed out an article by Rosa Luxembourg.  Next there were speakers from the Forest Foundation (speaking on fair trade), the NC Coalition to Defend Health Care, myself (on local labor struggles), El Pueblo (on immigration), and I can't remember the name of the group represented on pay day lending.  It was probably the Center for Responsible Lending of the Self Help Credit Union.  It was very informative, and lots of questions were asked, mainly about immigration and healthcare I think.  NC House bill 1358 on healthcare was praised I think.  El Pueblo supports a compromise on immigration that is more progressive, but still fines undocumented immigrants to not offend public opinion.  It shows how broken our system is that, while free trade destroys Latin American economies, legal immigration can require years of waiting, and a wait of I think up to 15 years for reuniting families.  No wonder immigration, encouraged by American employers, occurs illegally.  North Carolina has attacked predatory lending, but it hasn't been ended here yet.  A $50 dollar loan from these companies ends up costing the average debtor hundreds of dollars.           
 
I went over the 5 minute speaking time because I didn't plan my remarks in detail and left out some more distant campaigns out.  No one asked any questions about labor, and I expect that that indicates a problem with communication on these issues.  On the other hand, the audience did seem to know about some local campaigns.     
 
There were 16 of us in all, including the vice chair of the Durham Republican Party (!), one or two activists with the International Socialist Organization, Lori Khamala of the National Farm Worker Ministry, and others.  There was some balance, but I was also disappointed that the audience was mostly white.  There was more diversity by age (still younger than at the Durham impeachment meeting though) and sex.  I think part of the problem is that we started detailed publicity late and we didn't know the Independent wouldn't have an issue out the week before.  I didn't do as much online publicity for this, apart from emails.  Having gotten upper front page publicity that Sunday and in the A section Monday in the Herald-Sun, I expected a crowd.  Nicole expected more Durham People's Alliance members to turn out.  Maybe it has something to do with all the stuff organized for for May Day 2006, but I still think our publicity and approach could be improved.   
 
It was a start, and the DPA plans to do something next year too.  Next year hopefully we can organize something bigger, even multiple events, and I would encourage again organizing in Chapel Hill.  The immigration events probably added weight to the occasion, so it will be in people's minds for next year.  
 
I'm thinking of things to organize for July 2006, since July 4th relates to civil rights, democracy, and revolution.  The DPA might be interested in this idea.  I'm not sure exactly how to approach this.  Doing something like the May Day forum would be practical and could draw in other groups and more people, while organizing something specifically socialist would be my ideal, but maybe draw fewer people (because it is abstract and because there might not be strong local organizations to sponsor it, definitely not Alliance, unfortunately).  July 23rd is the anniversary of the Downing Street Minutes and should be marked by the Grass Roots Impeachment Movement and there will probably be a town meeting on impeachment somewhere in the Triangle for July.  I'm sure the Orange County and Durham Bill of Rights Defense Committees will have actions for July 4th.  Close before July 4th will be the Southeast Social Forum at NCCU in late June.   

Sunday, April 30, 2006

May 1st in Durham and TMF update

May Day events in Durham:
 
El Centro Hispano is planning an open house/community
forum - 201 W Main Street in Durham - 3:00 to 5pm (?).

For more information call them at 919.687.4635.


ReImagining May Day: International Worker's Day
Community Forum

May 1st.

Listen. Share. Empower. Act. (a Durham People's
Alliance committee) and the May Day Committee Bring
you this wonderful Community Forum.  What is May Day?
A short article:
http://students.washington.edu/ruckus/vol-2/issue-6/mayday.html
provides a great overview and history of the workers'
holiday.  We will highlight the history of May Day as
a workers' day, learn more about current worker issues
from a diverse panel and discuss what they mean to us
locally. Finally, we will regroup together to share
any activism or insights that came out of the break
out groups.

The Five panelists will speak on:  health care,
immigration, unions, fair trade and family matters.
Representatives from The Forest Foundation, NC
Committee to Defend Health Care, El Pueblo and others
will be on the panel.

We will meet at Durham at the Friends' Meeting House
on May 1st, 2006 from 7:00pm to 9:00pm.  The address
is 404 Alexander Ave in Durham.  For more info call
641-5474 or 544-7397.  If you are interested in
helping facilitate the small groups, please let us
know!


The May Day Agenda:

Understanding May Day and its HISTORY  (We will hold a
moment of silence to honor those workers who fought
hard for a reasonable work day, a weekend and other
worker rights.)  15 minutes
Current ISSUES and a 5 person PANEL discussing for 5
minutes each, followed by q&a.  - 45 minutes
GROUPS break-out around issue with facilitator (from 5
or more issues) for a plan of action, building deeper
awareness or getting involved in current activism….30
minutes
Groups can share their discussion with others if
desired, especially if action items or activism comes
out of it to invite others to be involved in. 30
minutes.

When: May 1st, 2006 from 7:00pm to 9:00pm

Where: Friends Meeting House located at 404 Alexander
Ave in Durham.  For directions and a map visit:
http://durhammonthlymtg.home.mindspring.com/Directions.htm
 
 
Triangle Marxist Forum update:
 
Currently the next meeting is scheduled for Saturday,
June 3rd 1:30-3:30 at the Chapel Hill Public Library
again.  Does this work for everyone who wants to participate?

This was another small meeting, in part because some
people were out of town or busy.  I think the lack of
an ad in the Indpendent contributed, along with the
late publicity.  We talked about several different
things, but also referred to the readings.  Some
subjects were the origins of materialism and
dialectics, how is Marxism scientific?, the crisis in
modern academic anthropology, and why the US isn't
more revolutionary after all that has happened to American workers and the people in general.

I haven't decided about the next readings yet, but
they will be about how capitalism works and might
include part II of the Communist Manifesto, the next
section of the Teachings of Karl Marx, something from
Marx's Wages, Prices and Profit, Capital, or some
other text, and a modern case study.  Let me know if
you have suggestions.  I'm not sure if more of Zinn's
book would fit for the next topic.

Announcements:

Another Freeing the Mind program, Predatory
Class War, is coming up on The People's Channel in Orange
County.

See above for the May Day events.  There was also a forum at the Hayti Heritage Center this afternoon that sounds like it was very similar to the event tomorrow evening.  It was not publicized much (at least where I might hear of it), so there was duplicated effort. 

Friday, April 28, 2006

Reportback about the town meeting on impeachment Thursday

The town meeting went pretty well and I've heard that
it could have been the best one yet in terms of
discussion and interest. There might have been around
60 people, up from 55 at the Hillsborough event, but
less than the Auditorium's capacity. Did anyone make
an exact count? I thought there were around 30 when I
got there, but later there were more people and I
might have underestimated. The crowd was somewhat
diverse, but mostly white and there were few people
under 30. GRIM, the Durham and Orange Co. BORDC's,
Kent Kanoy, and Stan Goff tabled.

Thanks to Joan, also representing the Durham Bill of
Rights Defense Committee, and John for moderating
(Joan moderated during the first half and John did so
for the second half). The meeting started with three
songs by the Raging Grannies, including one on
impeachment and the one saying "I'm going to let it
shine." Stan spoke first, linking the case for
impeachment to the Iraq War and from there to social
issues such as the huge and predominantly black US
prison population. He also pointed out Democratic
Party cooperation with Bush and the need to exert
pressure on both parties. Al McSurely spoke next and
talked about strategy and GRIM's list of impeachment
objections and answers, from the objection that
getting rid of Bush gives us Cheney to the argument
that working for impeachment detracts fron other
causes. Rev. Curtis Gatewood spoke about the
hypocrisy of "Bush Christians" (unfortunately none
came) and also linked impeachment to working class
issues and poverty.

There was time for several questions and comments.
There was some back and forth discussion, especially
about whether Iran will be attacked overtly and how
this could be sold to the public. We could have
talked for a while, but the Library was close to
closing. Kanoy was invited to speak briefly. Bowser,
a former Durham official and candidate for sheriff
this year, attended. I plan to write more here on
what was said later.

I'll write about the process of organizing this later,
since it could be useful for future events. I don't
think any of the media we contacted attended this time
and we don't have a recording. It could have been
better organized, since some decisions were made at
the start of the meeting and it started late, and the
publicity was good but could be better. There also
might have been conflicting election related events.
At the earliest we could have a second Durham event in
June without being in too much of a rush. In the
future it would be good to have women speakers
represented, but we were not able to find anyone this
time.

What are other people's impressions of or comments
about the meeting (see also
downingstreetactionnc.blogspot.com, the unofficial
campaign blog)?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Durham town meeting on impeaching Bush and Cheney Thursday

Come discuss the case for impeaching Bush and Cheney,
the process, and what citizens can do, Thursday, April
27th, 7-9pm in the Auditorium (to the right at the
entrance) of the Durham Main Library (300 North
Roxboro St.). Featured are NC NAACP 2nd Vice Pres.
Rev. Curtis Gatewood, civil rights lawyer Al McSurely,
Raleigh activist and author Stan Goff, and the Raging
Grannies.

This meeting was organized by the non-partisan Grass
Roots Impeachment Movement and follows the format of
the previous Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Hillsborough
town meetings. The next GRIM meeting might be around
May 19th. A formal organizing meeting was last Friday
in Chapel Hill, though the group has been around since
the beginning of the year under that name. Pittsboro
and Raleigh town meetings are being planned (and we
could use help). You can contact me by commenting here
or emailing me at southplumb@gmail.com.

www.davidpricewatch.org and www.impeachbushcheney.net
are also useful local sites and GRIM's new listserve
is grim@impeachbushcheney.net. The petition to Price
is still available online at
www.petitiononline.com/dsmnc/petition.html and on
paper in various places. There is also a campaign to
have people wear orange for impeachment on Fridays
(see orangetoimpeach.blogspot.com).

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

Triangle Marxist Forum meeting April 29th

The last meeting, March 25th, went well, though it was not as well organized as it should have been and we are still on the same topic this month. The next meeting will be in the afternoon on Saturday, April 29th, 1:30-3:30 at the Chapel Hill Public Library in the conference room downstairs from the lobby. I announced this earlier by email, but I've been late in posting it here.

I procrastinated and am still busy, so I'm suggesting readings for the meeting only now. The readings are: the Communist Manifesto, Sections I and II; The Teachings of Karl Marx, also called Karl Marx - A Brief Biographical Sketch With an Exposition of Marxism (by Lenin) , in Section I, Marx's Teachings to the section Marx's Economic Doctrine, and Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States, chapter 5, especially towards the end where Zinn writes about the US Constitution. I might suggest short articles about the revolutionary politics in Venezuela and Nepal also, so we have three concrete examples, along with theoretical works to look at.

Chapter 4 Section II of A Short History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolshevik) goes into more detail, but is basically like the Lenin text. I'll postpone beginning argument about Stalin, if that is necessary, till later. I think we should discuss Stalin, pro and con. I argue that Stalin was a Marxist who has been villified because the Soviet Union under his leadership was so succesful in building and defending an alternative to capitalism.

Friday, March 10, 2006

Legalized Torture and Creepinfg Fascism

A third useful article on US use of torture is the following by Alfred McCoy, from TomDispatch (see http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=57336).  I heard McCoy speak on Democracy Now recently and he had many interesting things to say about the CIA's development of psychological torture techniques (and later about the CIA's involvement in the illegal drug trade).  Maybe I will post an article I saw a while ago on the mind breaking methods developed by the CIA in the 60's or 70's, supposedly modelled on Soviet methods (it could be true, but I won't believe it automatically out of prejudice against the USSR).  Britain is seemingly taking a higher road on torture than our government, although I am skeptical (and I recall that Britain had its own Iraqi prisoner torture photos coming out at one point). This article also shows the creep of American fascism.  Bush's claim of a "unitary executive branch" violates the Constitutional separation of powers and in this case is a claim that the President is above the law and Congressional oversight.  I'm currently reading Michael Ruppert's book Crossing the Rubicon, which links Peak Oil, illegal drugs, and the 9/11 attacks, and this week I got to the chapter on repressing the American people and it was chilling.  We might have the form of democracy right now, but everything is in place for the mask to come off when the ruling class feels truly threatened.  Without a strong revolutionary movement the government is not threatened enough domestically to crackdown at home.  That isn't to say that things are good now (witness Bush's flouting of Congress and other literally criminal acts and the militarization of New Orleans after Katrina). 
 
Why the McCain Torture Ban Won't Work
   By Alfred W. McCoy
   TomDispatch.com


   Wednesday 08 February 2006

The Bush legacy of legalized torture.
   Just before Christmas, two of the world's most
venerable legislative bodies engaged in erudite,
impassioned debate over what the right balance should
be between the imperatives of national security and
international prohibitions on torture. They arrived at
starkly divergent conclusions that reveal the depth of
damage the war on terror is doing to this country's
civil liberties.

   On December 7, the House of Lords, reviewing cases
in which a dozen Muslim militants were to be deported,
spoke with moral clarity on the issue of torture,
branding it "an unqualified evil" which should have no
place in the proud, thousand-year tradition of British
justice. Just a week later, the U.S. Senate amended
the Defense Appropriations Bill to prohibit the
"abuse" of detainees in American custody, including
the many Muslims at our Guantanamo prison, but did so
on the purely pragmatic, almost amoral grounds that it
"leads to bad intelligence." Under pressure from the
White House, the senators also loaded this legislation
with loopholes that may soon allow coerced testimony -
extracted through torture - into American courts for
the first time in two centuries.

   This disconcerting contrast is but one sign that,
under the Bush administration, the United States is
moving to publicly legitimate the use of torture, even
to the point of twisting this congressional ban on
inhumane interrogation in ways that could ultimately
legalize such acts. And following their President's
lead, the American people seem to be developing a
tolerance, even a taste, for torture.

   This country may, in fact, be undergoing an
historic shift with profound implications for
America's international standing. It seems to be
moving from the wide-ranging but highly secretive
tortures wielded by the Central Intelligence Agency
during the Cold War decades to an open, even proud use
of coercive interrogation as a formal weapon in the
arsenal of American power, acceptable both to U.S.
courts and the American people.
 
(the rest is at the Web address above)

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Study group update - meeting March 25th

Below is an update on the next study group meeting.  I
suggest a Lenin reading, but it probably doesn't add
to what is said in the other readings and is more of a
summary.  Please let interested people or calendars
know about this.  For more information email
alliance_trianglenc@hotmail.com.

The group was advertised at the Conference of Students
United for a Responsible Global Environment February
25th at NCCU and I plan to table March 18th at the
Fayetteville anti-war protest.

Triangle Marxist Forum March discussion on the
evolution of society (the theory of historical
materialism), Saturday March 25th at 1:30pm at Duke's
Center for Documentary Studies (cds.aas.duke.edu).
For the list of background readings see
durhamspark.blogspot.com.

Readings for the March meeting:

Marx and Engels:  Communist Manifesto, Sections I and
III

Engels:  The Origin of the Family, Private Propety,
and the State, Sections I and II

A Short History of the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union (Bolshevik),  Chapter 4 Section II

A useful overview:  Lenin:  The Teachings of Karl
Marx, Section I:  Marx's Teachings – The Class
Struggle

These readings are also available on the Web.
Marx2Mao is a recommended source, if it is still
available, and the Marxist Internet Archive might have
all of these readings as well.  Email me for help
finding texts.

The discussion won't be completely reading based, so
if you don't read everything you can still participate.  The
format will be a discussion based on what questions/comments
people bring and on general study questions.
 

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Second Rendition Article - How NC Relates to the USA's Global Torture Archipelago

The Guradian/UK published an article March 19th (republished at http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0319-07.htm), Afghanistan: "One Huge US Jail," which was the first article I saw on the Johnston County torture connection. The article alleges that the airplane based here has been used in the kidnapping of foreign citizens for torture and in several cases murder under torture. It also describes the lawless and oppressive occupation of Afghanistan by our country and supposedly more peace loving countries in Europe that later verbally opposed the Iraq War. There are also articles on the global torture network in Alliance!, www.allianceml.com.

Triangle Marxist Forum discussion group update: The next meeting will be March 25th 1:30-3:30 at the Center for Documentary Studies again. Also, I'm going to suggest a Lenin reading that provides a good overview, but the other readings cover the same material, so they are somewhat interchangeable. I'll post more later in the week.

Monday, February 13, 2006

Spotlighting North Carolina's CIA Torture Conection

Below is the first of three useful articles I will post on the current CIA's involvement in torture, especially the connection to activities at an airport in Johnston County, North Carolina. There are protests every second Saturday (but maybe not in March, because of the March 18th anti-war demonstration in Fayetteville) against this near the airport (see the Independent Weely Act Now section for details).

There will probably be an article about this is the spring issue of Alliance! (probably coming out in April), and we have already published at least one article on the government's use of torture.

Another thing to look at is whether Lockheed's RTP offices (there are two listed in the phone book) are involved in supplying civilian interrogators, who might practice torture, for the government.

What Is AERO CONTRACTORS? Here's the rundown.
Saturday, 19 November 2005
by Clayton Hallmark
St. Louis Independent Media Center:http://www.stlimc.org/

BREAKING SCOOP IN NORTH CAROLINA [Smithfield, North Carolina, Nov. 18, 2005] Tarheels won't be put under the boot heel of Big Brother. They were well represented among the 60 protestors of CIA torture flights out of Smithfield, NC. Fourteen protesters were arrested Friday for trespassing at the Johnston County Airport near Smithfield. They gathered to protest the use of the airport by a company that reportedly shuttles prisoners to torture and nonjudicial confinement for the CIA. Channel 5 (WRAL-TV) in Raleigh is doing a good job of covering the story.

The group targeted Aero Contractors Limited, a company located on the airport grounds. News organizations, including Indymediahttp://chapelhill.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/17197.php, have reported that planes for secret CIA rendition (kidnap-torture) flights originate from the airport. Of course the CIA says that it does not conductrenditions.

THE CIA PILOT'S EMPLOYMENT AGENCY Aero Contractors, Ltd, is one of the real (as opposed to shell) companies tied to the CIA. It owns no planes, according to the FAA's registry database, but its operation in eastern North Carolina is perhaps th emain hub of the CIA airline. Another hub is the Camp Peary Naval Reservation, "the Farm" near Williamsburg, VA, which the CIA uses for training and other purposes. (Is this the "family farm" where the DCIA, Porter Goss, hopes to retire soon?) Still another is the Bob Sikes Field airport in Florida, which Tepper Aviation operates from as discussed later. And then there is Dulles Airport outside Washington, DC, which is a hub of government activity of all kinds.

All of those CIA prison plane flights that are so much in the news lately? Here is the typical flight plan: Johnston County, NC, to Dulles (to pick up CIA personnel), to Sweden (or some other country with a sizable Muslim population), to some destination in theMiddle East or North Africa -- one of the countries that torture as a part of interrogations.

AERO CONTRACTORS HISTORY Aero Contractors, Ltd, was founded in 1979 by the late (he "bought the farm" near Johnston County Airport in 2001), Jim "Peg Leg" Rhyne, who was one of the chief pilots of Air America, the CIA's airline of the Vietnam era [which I think has been tied to illegal drug smuggling up to the present], which has been succeeded by Aero Contractors and about a dozen other companies.

The current proprietor (president) of Aero Contractors is Stormin' Norman Richardson, an old hand at the "hospitality" business. Richardson once operated a truck stop (Stormin' Norman's) and apparently operates a Stormin' Norman's chicken-and-ribs joint in his home town of Kenly, NC. Richardson appears to be a figurehead at the company, more involved in his chicken-and-ribs business, since almost all public contact is with Robert W. Blowers, the assistant general manager, who has actually run the company since about 1994.

Dun and Bradstreet lists Aero Contractors' business as "aircraft rental with pilot." This company probably is the primary supplier of pilots for CIA-owned and-operated planes http://chapelhill.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/17197.php.I t has no planes of its own, but has claimed to lease them from Premier Executive Transport, a well known CIA front company (whose planes have been moved to other holding companies). As a supplier of planes to Aero and the CIA, Premier has been supplanted by the other shell companies shown in the CIA plane-ownership table http://chapelhill.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/17197.php.

Aero Contractors has no website and does no advertising for business, apparently getting all it needs from the CIA, the military, and possibly other government agencies. It is, however, a real company with premises and about 80 employees. The company operates out a blue hangar at the south end of the 5500-ft runway, at the end of Charlie Day St., at Johnston County Airport (identifier code JNX) near Raleigh, NC. This fact makes the Johnston CountyAirport a hub, perhaps the hub, of CIA air operations. Its address is 3463 Swift Creek Rd, Smithfield, NC 27577.

AERO CONTRACTORS PLAYS GAMES WITH THE PLANES Interestingly, although the company has no planes registered, the Kinston (NC) Free Press newspaper reported that the "Smithfield charter plane company" was building a 20,000-square-foot, $2 million hangar at the Kinston Regional Jetport TO STORE *ITS* BOEING 737 BUSINESS JET! This apparently is a reference toTHE *CIA'S* (not Aero's) 737, Boeing serial number 33010, N-number 4476S (currently owned under the cover of the Nevada shell company Keeler and Tate Management, LLC, which shares an address and telephone with former U.S. Senator and Reagan "First Friend" Paul Laxalt).

In an article published on March 9, 2005, Aero's assistant general manager, Robert W. Blowers, told the Raleigh News & Observer that "Aero Contractors, which
leased the jets for about a year, in about 2002 or 2003, from Massachusetts-based Premier Executive Transport Services, Blowers said." The same article reported: "Aero Contractors let its leases with Premier Executive expire about a year ago, Blowers said. Aero Contractors no longer offers jets for its clients and instead leases turboprop planes, he said.

"http://newsobserver.com/news/story/2192261p-8573362c.html

Though Blowers said that Aero let its jet leases expire about March 2004, the Goldsboro (NC) News Argus reported two months *after* that, quote, "...a 20,000-square-foot hangar is being built by Aero Contractors, an aircraft charter company. It will house a Boeing Business Jet 737-700 aircraft."http://64.233.161.104/search?q\u003dcache:2e6qpm3hidIJ:www.ncdot.org/news/dailyclips/2004-06-24t.html+kinston+jetport+%22aero+contractors%22&hl\u003den

Why build a hangar when you no longer have the plane (the CIA's 737)?

Including the 737 owned by the dummy Keeler and Tate, Aero Contractors operates about 20 planes, probably mostly drawn from the 27-plane roster of CIA planes (one of which is the Boston Red Sox executive jet) shown in the table, plus about 26 of its own, mostly small Cessnas. It also provides avionics modification and repair services as well as pilots.

PLANESPOTTER'S GUIDE TO AERO CONTRACTORS Planespotter hobbyists use high-power binoculars at the end of runways to record the comings and goings of specific planes at airports around the world, and post sightings and photos on websites like http://www.airliners.net/ . For example searching that site for the CIA's 737, tail No. N4476S, you can find that it was in Prague this year and you can see a photo of it during a takeoff in Spain the day after the Madrid terrorist attack last year. The Prague sighting alone belies the claims that the CIA does not conduct prison plane flights to EasternEurope.

Planespotters monitor the radio transmissions to and from these planes around the world and at CIA hubs like the Johnston County Airport near Smithfield ,North Carolina, where they contact the airport on122.8 MHz and the Raleigh approach-and-departure controllers on 125.8 MHz. Sites like http://www.airnav.com/airport/ give the frequencies for the vast majority of the world's airports. Note: Reporting the sighting of airplanes is legal; reporting the*content* of radio transmissions is not. Merely listening to communications using an ordinary receiver that covers the aviation frequencies is legal and helps planespotters get photographs and record activities of desired planes. Of course the CIA says that it does not conduct renditions.

Since the runway at Johnston County is too short to accommodate the CIA 737, Aero Contractors operates that plane out of the Kinston Regional Jetport (identifier code ISO) near Kinston, NC (Lenoir county), which has an 11,500-ft runway. Aero Contractors stored the $50-million-plus aircraft outside at the North Carolina Global TransPark (GTP) site of the jetport, pending completion of the hangar. The GTP is a failed state-run industrial park for aviation-dependent
handful of employees at this location next to MountainAir Cargo, at the end of Jetport Rd (2780 Jetport Rd,Suite A, Kinston, NC 28504-8032), which may be theheadquarters of the management.

If you take a Delta Airlines commuter flight to Kinston (from Atlanta), you might get a glimpse of theCIA's 737 (N33010) on the ground, or of its Gulfstream V, N44982 (serial number 581). You might see any ofthe CIA planes (except the 737) at Johnston County, especially the planes of CIA aircraft holding companies Aviation Specialties and Stevens Express Leasing. This is because Aero Contractors is their main source of pilots. The CIA frequently changes the N-numbers. It also creates new companies as needed to provide cover, and plays a shell game with the shell companies, shifting the planes from one company to another. When the CIA-owned Gulfstream V heads overseas to snatch a victim, it takes off from the Johnston County Airport (JNX) at Smithville, NC, stops at the Dulles International Airport (IAD) in Virginia (near Washington, DC) to pick up the snatch team, and heads overseas. Frequently it stops at the Shannon Airport in Ireland for refueling.

For other jobs and other planes (the 737, forexample), there is sometimes a stop at the CAMP PEARYLANDING STRIP (W94), about 2 miles NE of Queens Lake, Virginia, before heading for Dulles. Camp Peary is just east of the route 143 Williamsburg exit ofInterstate 64. From Queens Drive in Queens Lake, youcan see the planes landing or taking off. If you happened to be "fishing" on the York River, you would pass within a few meters of runway 23 about a mile and a half north of the outlet of the Queen Creek. The landing strip is within the Camp Peary NavalReservation. All of this is in southeastern Virginia, just east of Williamsburg, a town famous for its historical restorations. The coastal plain of Virginia and neighboring North Carolina, a limited area with a width of up to about 100 miles, has most of the main centers of CIA aviation and other activities.

The CIA's Gulfstream, N44982 (ex-N379P), and other Aero Contractors planes except the 737 can operate out of the Johnston County Airport (JNX) in North Carolina. Other frequent visitors to JNX are the planes of CIA aircraft holding companies (see table) AVIATION SPECIALTIES, INC.; STEVENS EXPRESS LEASING, INC.; DEVON HOLDING AND LEASING, INC.; and CIA contractor (plane owner-operator) AVIATION WORLDWIDESERVICES / PRESIDENTIAL AVIATION. The JNX airport uses the following communications channels (frequencies arein megahertz, Mhz). Of course the CIA says that itdoes not conduct renditions.

JOHNSTON COUNTY AIRPORT, NORTH CAROLINA, (JNX) FREQUENCIES (perhttp://www.airnav.com/)CTAF/UNICOM: 122.8RALEIGH APPROACH: 125.3RALEIGH DEPARTURE: 125.3

The CIA airline's flagship, Boeing 737 N4476S, operates out of the Kinston Regional Jetport (KISO).Kinston uses these frequencies (megahertz, MHz):
KINSTON REGIONAL JETPORT, NORTH CAROLINA, (ISO) FREQUENCIESCTAF: 120.6UNICOM: 122.95KINSTON GROUND: 121.9 [0630-2200] KINSTON TOWER: 120.6 335.55 [0630-2200] SEYMOUR JOHNSON APPROACH: 127.3 SEYMOUR JOHNSON DEPARTURE: 127.3

* COMMUNICATIONS PROVIDED BY NEW BERN RADIO ON FREQ122.15R.

* APCH/DEP SVC PRVDD BY WASHINGTON ARTCC (NEW BERNRCAG) ON FREQ135.5/272.75 WHEN APCH CTL CLSD

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Triangle Marxist Forum study group information

The meeting on January 28th was very small, but a number of people said they were interested in this, so there will be a second meeting. What towns, venues, and times work for people who want to come? Unless I hear otherwise (here or by the local Alliance email), I am thinking of having it on a Saturday at the Center for Documentary Studies again, later this month or early in March.

My proposal for group is to start by following the eight thematic classes produced by Bill Bland of Britain's Communist League in the early 70's and some of Alliance's added suggested readings. After this we could either go deeper into some of the readings, look at modern issues like national questions in this country or why the USSR fell (what were the economic and political reasons?), or discuss non-Marxist, but possibly informative books like "What's the Matter With Kansas?" or whatever participants suggest.

The first course is on the evolution of society (the theory of historical materialism). The readings I propose are sections I and III of the Communist Manifesto (pages 482-496 and 506-517) , Sections I and II of Engels' The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (pages 134-190), and Chapter 4 Section II (pages 105-132) of A Short History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolshevik), a theortical section. I probably haven't read the Engels reading before, so that will be new to me.

Is this too much reading? Unless we focus on the readings, just reading the Manifesto might be enough for the discussion. The courses have a question and answer format focusing on basics, rather than directly focusing on readings. Alliance recommends the Marx2Mao site for readings these works online, which I am told is now available from a European mirror site. The Marxist Internet Archive might also be useful.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Study group meeting and impeachment actions this week

An interest meeting for a Marxism discussion group will be held Saturday, January 28, at 3pm at Duke's Center for Documentary Studies (1317 W. Pettigrew St., near the intersection with Swift Avenue/Broad Street, directions available at cds.aas.duke.edu). The group will combine
classical texts (probably starting with The Communist Manifesto and going on thematically) with modern or non-Marxist works on current issues and situations (possibly Thomas Franks' What's The Matter With Kansas?). It will look at Marxist economic, political, and social theories and practice. Organized by Alliance Marxist-Leninist (www.allianceml.com) but not limited to Alliance's viewpoint and discussion with members of other groups welcome (I asked local FRSO, Ray O. Light, and Solidarity groups if they would like to be involved, and others are welcome). There seems to be at least some individual interest in doing this, so there will probably be at least a handful of people at the first meeting. For more information email alliance_trianglenc at hotmail.com.

Thursday at 7pm there will be a meeting at Internationalist Books (405 W. Franklin St.) in Chapel Hill to plan a group meeting with Representative David Price (D-NC), which will probably be Monday, the 30th at 1:30 at his Chapel Hill office. The meeting is to present a Bush impeachment petition (mainly relating to the Downing Street memos, available at www.afterdowningstreet.org) petition to him. The petition is online at www.petitiononline.com/dsmnc/petition.html. This Friday there will be a Triangle town meeting on impeachment at the Carrboro Town Hall (I think the address is 105 W. Main Street), possibly the first in a series, the next one being February 28th at the Chapel Hill Town Hall. For more information, see downingstreetactionnc.blogspot.com. Things are starting to move more with this locally, and we will know better where we stand next week.

Monday, January 02, 2006

Defending the US Constitution

I believe in socialism and the dictatorship of the proletariat (meaning the dominance of the working class, instead of the current domination of the bourgeoisie), but this doesn't mean I don't respect our Constitution or that I am hypocritical in saying the Bush Administration is unConstitutional.

The Constitution is bourgeois and designed to limit democracy, oppressing the lower classes, as are the constitutions of all capitalist states. For example, the two house Congress, Electoral College, Executive, illusion of an impartial judiciary, original protection of slavery, and other features. Some of these features might be useful in the future, but from what the Founding Fathers wrote, it looks like these were used to safeguard the wealthy classes. There isn't an abstract government system that is always best, it depends on the context of who that government serves.

That said, the Constitution was an improvement over the feudal remnants in Britain during the American Revolution and it makes classical fascism difficult to implement here. The Bill of Rights, which wasn't in the original draft of the Constitution, is democratic in many ways. The separation of powers, which will probably be reduced after a revolution (to combine the executive and legislative bodies in councils like communes and soviets), was designed to prevent change threatening the rich, but today it protects us against Bush's authoritarianism. I say it protects us, but really it is up to the people to safeguard the Constitution, otherwise it is just the scrap of paper Bush thinks it is. For worst case scenarios the Constitution allows citizens to be armed against tyranny (as did the Paris Commune, the original socialist government). A revolution within the Constitution and parliamentary means is unlikely, but the Constitution does allow that possibility.

We can respect the Constitution and demand that the bourgeoisie follow it, but for true democracy and the end of class oppression we must go beyond it. The working class and others, even part of the bourgeoisie, defend the Constitution against those who want to limit democracy to suit the era of monopoly capitalism (see Lenin's Imperialism). But even Jefferson, writing before the existence of a clear proletariat, acknowledged that to defend democracy there might have to be future watering of the "tree of liberty" with blood, which I assume would also mean new government. Following the second American Revolution, the a new constitution will probably be written, following American principles and establishing the rule of law, but not designed to legitimate the oppression of the working class (Capital and other works explain why the existence of wealthy capitalists is oppression and not just the way things are). As socialism develops into communism new constitutions might be needed, to better suit the economic system of the time, this time written without revolution to overthrow vested interests who prevent necessary change.

The Constitution is flawed, but one side wants to ignore or rewrite it to increase oppression and subvert democracy, while progressives want to safeguard the bourgeois democracy it creates and increase the power of the people, which I think will require going outside and beyond the Constitution.